Ответ НАСА на предполагаемый отказ от слушаний UAP.
NASA was not requested to participate in the United States House Committee’s hearing on UAP. David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation and chair of NASA’s UAP Independent Study, was invited but declined to attend, since the work of the independent study team is not due to…
— NASA (@NASA) July 21, 2023
Похожие записи:
Спорные смерти исследователей НЛО, журналистов и авторов. (лекция Питера Роббинса)
В свете недавних заявлений Дэвида Груша, возможно, пришло время еще раз взглянуть на звонящего из Зоны 51 от побережья до побережья. (Начало с 1:33) Также обратите внимание, что в последние годы становится все труднее найти это видео на YouTube.
Fin365 — Black Diamond НЛО преследует озеро Онтарио — 2001 — компьютерная реконструкция
Тайны и споры об НЛО: специальный репортаж на NewsNation
Кто-нибудь может поговорить с Хаимом Эшедом?
Так считаются ли иглу и гамбургеры одной и той же формой? Нам нужно начать копаться в старых книгах об НЛО
50к за мусорное ведро
Само влияние заявления Груша о том, что правительство сдерживает технологию чистой энергии, ошеломляет.
Я попытался выяснить, говорит ли Дэвид Груш правду, перевернув звук из его интервью NewsNation.
Синтез, отдача, открытие: обнаружен новый тип атомного ядра
We investigate UAPs, but not yours
That’s really kinda splitting hairs. Of course all of NASA wasn’t asked to show up, the room wasn’t big enough for that. And when members of congress ask you do show up to a meeting, I imagine it’s pretty much expected of you to do just that.
​
**»Why did you back out of the July 26th House Oversight Committee Hearing on UAP’s? This is an opportunity to he transparent with the American people.**
**Thank you for your answer and I continue to look forward to your parallel investigation on UAP’s.»**
NASA was not requested to participate in the United States House Committee’s hearing on UAP. David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation and chair of NASA’s UAP Independent Study, was invited but declined to attend, since the work of the independent study team is not due to be completed until later in the coming weeks. The report will contain a series of recommendations for NASA to better evaluate and categorize the nature of UAPs. You can learn more here: https://go.nasa.gov/3K7Tlkn
“We, NASA, weren’t invited. This guy we hired was and declined. They will have their own stuff completed in a couple weeks.”
Cool… Soooo you, NASA, gunna come or nah? I’m sure the invite still stands lol…
PR firm is working on it.
If you click the link, it takes you to an FAQ about their study. Now, remember, they’re not even studying the data yet.
This is a study about how to study the data. With that in mind, they seem to have jumped the gun on #14. In the legal system, this is grounds for recusal.
14. Are there any data supporting the idea that UAP are evidence of alien technologies?
No. Most UAP sightings result in very limited data, making it difficult to draw scientific conclusions about the nature of UAP.
You have to pay attention to these folks in how they word things. Everything goes through a lawyer to protect their rear end. Their request was to provide first hand accounts, not a series of recommendations for themselves, governing self regulation. Maybe they are right over the target.
​
*»NASA was not requested to participate in the United States House Committee’s hearing on UAP. David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation and chair of NASA’s UAP Independent Study, was invited but declined to attend, since the work of the independent study team is not due to be completed until later in the coming weeks. The report will contain a series of recommendations for NASA to better evaluate and categorize the nature of UAPs. You can learn more here: https://go.nasa.gov/3K7Tlkn«*
Is it just me, or does the second sentence contradict the first?
Them boots be stepping for sure.
These hearings are beginning to come off a bit «the year of Linux»
“ NASA has not found any credible evidence of extraterrestrial life and there is no evidence that UAPs are extraterrestrial. “ — looks like NASA has already given their answer
PSYOP who cares
What recommendable passion for the unknown, definitely what you wanna see in an organization dedicated to research.
No one ever said NASA dropped out of the hearing or was even set to participate in the hearing at all. The only thing that was said is that NASA had backed out of “cooperating” with congress.
So, my best guess is that something similar to what happened at Eglin Airforce Base has happened with NASA also; probably some level of stonewalling congress.
Oh, look. A perfectly reasonable post that this sub will turn into a conspiracy theory.
Domt get your hopes up. Nothing. Nada. Will be revieled that you havent seen or heard before
Pffft pack of disingenuous liars
bunch of p*ssies, too busy helping cover ups.
Tbh the house is a shit show
«Was not requested…»
Anyone else get the feeling there is some BS happening here yet?
NASA equals never a straight answer. That seems to be holding true in this case. Time for subpena powers? One of the questions I would ask the NASA rep would be to tell us about the airbrushing of photographs before they are released to the public?
well, this is just persiflage with rhetoric. synecdoche means you refer to something by the part rather than the whole, or the whole rather than the part. spergel is part of nasa, comes as representing an activity of nasa, so to say that «nasa is coming» when an employee of nasa is coming is perfectly understandable.
to reply that «NASA» wasn’t invited depends on how the invitation was extended, but how else would «NASA», an institution of government, attend a meeting? how would you get all the employees of NASA into the hearing chamber?
They have been part of the active deception machine since the beginning. Why would they willingly out themselves?
Who do you folks consider to be reliable ‘NASA whistleblowers’, based on what validation process, please?
Nasa is lying again oh moronic scums prove me wrong
Never a straight answer