«Теория UAP»: сайт, на котором я нашел достоверные данные. Могут ли умные умы разобраться в этом и разобраться??

От admin #Внеземные существа, #Внекосмические существа, #Внешний вид пришельцев, #Загадки инопланетного воздействия, #Загадки инопланетных цивилизаций, #ЗагадкиИнопланетныхЦивилизаций, #ЗагадочныеЯвления., #Заговоры, #ЗаговорыВИстории, #ЗаговорыВМедиа, #ЗаговорыГосударств, #ЗаговорыМировыхЛидеров, #Иллюминаты, #Инопланетная жизнь, #Инопланетные существа в кино, #Инопланетные технологии, #ИнопланетныеВоздействия, #ИнопланетныеИсследования, #ИнопланетныеТехнологии, #Инопланетяне, #ИнтеракцияСИнопланетянами, #Интракосмические существа, #Исследование инопланетной жизни, #ИсследованиеИнопланетнойЖизни, #Конспирология, #Контакт с инопланетянами, #Контактные СИнопланетянами, #Космические пришельцы, #МанипуляцияМассами, #Межзвездные путешествия, #Научная фантастика, #НаучнаяОбщаяФантастика, #Популярные о пришельцах, #Пришельцы в алфавите, #ПришельцыВМедиа. ТеорияЗаговора, #ПришельцыВНауке, #ПришельцыИлюди, #связанные с пришельцами, #СекретныеОрганизации, #СекретыГосударственнойВласти, #СекретыТехнологий, #СкрытыеСилы, #СовременныеТайны, #Способы достиженияСПришельцами, #Способы общения с пришельцами, #СпрятанныеПравды, #ТайныеЗаговоры, #Телешоу на инопланетянах, #Теории заговоров о пришельцах, #ТеорииГосударстваОпришельцах, #ТеорииЗаговораОБиологии, #ТеорииЗаговораОмедицин е, #ТеорииЗаговораОпришельцами, #Уроки инопланетной истории. 窗体顶端 窗体底端 ЭкспериментыПришельцев, #Фантастические инопланетяне, #Фильмы о пришельцах, #Фэндом пришельцев, #Экзобиология, #ЭкспериментальнаяНаука, #ЭкспериментыНадЛюдьми, #Явления


[Here’s a link to the site.](https://uaptheory.com/) Я вижу там много данных о том, как путешествует UAP. Информация о геодезии, гравитационном линзировании и многом другом, большую часть которой я просто не в состоянии расшифровать. Что мы можем сделать с этими данными? Есть идеи? Что вы об этом думаете? Спасибо. Изменить: снова с отрицательными голосами. Этому сообщению меньше часа, и оно уже было [slammed.](https://imgur.com/a/Nh74Cvt) Я просто привел кучу данных. Я не понимаю, почему мой пост не может быть услышан. И это продолжает происходить.

От admin

21 комментарий для “«Теория UAP»: сайт, на котором я нашел достоверные данные. Могут ли умные умы разобраться в этом и разобраться??”
  1. I remember when this first came out. Made a pretty big splash. But was picked apart, and also doxxed. The author had been making some pretty wild claims and also been involved in some «the holocaust was an ascension and the executioners was the good guys» type discussion.

    I think that was where it ended and the guy deleted his account. Possible that some of the claims about the tech side holds merit. The search engine might bring up old posts about the actual claims, his account had the same name as the site.

  2. There is no reason to posit extraterrestrial origin. It could just as well be a breakaway civilization of terrestrial origin that has vacated habitation of the surface of the Earth and ceased contact with us since prehistory or ancient times.

    Of course such technology implies extraterrestrial reach. But it says nothing about origin.

  3. » I fail to see why I can’t get my post heard. And this keeps happening. I will take this to the Mods and ADMIN if I have to.»

    Your post is live in the sub as of 3 hours ago.

    Engagement is dependent upon the community.

  4. **Analysis by ChatGPT 4:**

    Based on the content retrieved from uaptheory.com, here’s a summary and analysis against known scientific knowledge:

    **Quantum Entanglement and Space:** The website mentions the concept of quantum entanglement being related to the structure of space. It suggests that the amount of entanglement between two bits determines how close their corresponding spatial points are. This is a topic of ongoing research in the field of quantum gravity, and while there are theories that suggest space might emerge from quantum entanglement, it’s still a topic of debate and hasn’t been conclusively proven.

    **Gravitation and Quantum Entanglement:** The site references the idea that gravitation (or the curvature of spacetime) might be a property of a quantum entanglement network related to its entropy. This is a relatively new and speculative idea in the realm of theoretical physics. While there are some theories, like the one proposed by Erik Verlinde, that suggest gravity might have an entropic origin, they are still under investigation and are not widely accepted as definitive explanations.

    **Dark Matter:** The website suggests that dark matter might not exist and that the additional gravity observed in galaxies might be a quantum correction to general relativity. While there are alternative theories to dark matter, the consensus in the scientific community is that dark matter exists, even if its exact nature is still unknown.

    **UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena):** The site delves into the topic of UAPs, suggesting that they might be extraterrestrial in origin and that they move along geodesics (paths in spacetime). It also mentions observations of UAPs entering the ocean and moving silently. While UAPs have been observed and documented, their origins and nature remain a mystery. The scientific community has not reached a consensus on their origins, and they remain a topic of investigation.

    **Gravitational Lensing:** The site discusses observations of what appears to be gravitational lensing around some UAPs. Gravitational lensing is a well-understood phenomenon in astrophysics where massive objects (like galaxies or black holes) bend the path of light passing near them. However, the application of this concept to UAPs is speculative and not based on established scientific knowledge.

    In summary, while the website touches on several intriguing and speculative ideas, many of them are not widely accepted or proven within the scientific community. It’s essential to approach such topics with a critical mind and consult multiple sources to get a comprehensive understanding.

    Let’s break down the main theoretical aspects presented by the website and the conclusions they draw from them:

    **Quantum Entanglement and Space:**

    **Theory:** Quantum entanglement is related to the structure of space, with the amount of entanglement between two bits determining the closeness of their corresponding spatial points.

    **Conclusion:** A deeper understanding of space and distances within it can be achieved, leading to insights into the nature of motion.

    If the theory is correct, then the conclusion that we can gain a deeper understanding of space and motion does follow. However, it’s a significant leap to suggest that this understanding would immediately lead to technological advancements or the ability to manipulate spacetime.

    **Gravitation and Quantum Entanglement:**

    **Theory:** Gravitation might be a property of a quantum entanglement network related to its entropy.

    **Conclusion:** Gravity might have an entropic explanation, and if we had a complete theory of quantum gravity, we could potentially manipulate the entanglement network, similar to how quantum computers manipulate quantum bits.

    If gravity is indeed a property of quantum entanglement, and we fully understand this relationship, then in theory, manipulating this network might be possible. However, the comparison to quantum computers is a bit of a stretch. While quantum computers leverage quantum mechanics, manipulating spacetime would be a vastly more complex endeavor.

    **Dark Matter:**

    **Theory:** Dark matter might not exist, and the additional gravity observed in galaxies might be a quantum correction to general relativity.

    **Conclusion:** Traditional explanations involving dark matter might be incorrect.

    If the theory is correct, then the conclusion that our understanding of dark matter might be flawed does follow. However, this would require a significant revision of current astrophysical models.

    **UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena):**

    **Theory:** UAPs might be extraterrestrial in origin and move along geodesics.

    **Conclusion:** Given the advanced technology displayed by UAPs, their extraterrestrial origin is very likely, especially considering the vastness of cosmic time scales.

    Even if UAPs move along geodesics, concluding that they are of extraterrestrial origin is speculative. While the behavior of UAPs might suggest advanced technology, there are many potential explanations, and extraterrestrial origin is just one of them.

    **Gravitational Lensing:**

    **Theory:** Some UAPs display patterns consistent with gravitational lensing.

    **Conclusion:** The observed patterns around UAPs might be due to gravitational lensing effects.

    If the observed patterns around UAPs are indeed due to gravitational lensing, then the conclusion follows. However, attributing these patterns to gravitational lensing requires more evidence and rigorous analysis.

    In summary, if the theoretical aspects presented by the website are correct, some of the conclusions do follow logically. However, others are more speculative and would require additional evidence and validation. It’s also worth noting that even if the theories are correct, the practical implications (e.g., manipulating spacetime) would still be a significant leap and would require further technological and scientific advancements.

  5. Maybe being slammed is justified? How about you address that rather than being more worried about internet upvote points? Not everyone has to agree with you.

    Reading the comments about it, I’m not surprised it’s slammed.

  6. Thank you for sharing the site, OP.

    The site shares some observations and draws logical conclusions from them. The reasoning is sound and any worthy critique should be in counter arguments, which would also lead the analysis of UAP forward.

    Apart from the speculation on UAP technology, the analysis of likelihood of NHI (non-human intelligence) should also be underscored as a missing and very relevant topic in the general discussion of UAP.

  7. Pretty cool, I like this quote from the site..

    «As Richard Feynman said, “it is scientific only to say what is more likely or less likely.” We can now say there are 6 billion Earth-like planets in our galaxy alone. What’s more, in 2020, 24 planets were identified to be more habitable than the Earth …. »

    Theres actually a couple dozen planets that are *more* habitable than earth. Not only does that mean life could develop there potentially, but also earth might not be that special as far as liquid water and resources go.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *