Почему третий результат из этой статьи принадлежит Northrop-Grumman?
Похожие записи:
Запрос: 2011.03 Фукусима (сфера) НЛО
Белый шар 13.05.2022 Видеоанализ. Цифровой артефакт? МКС? Передняя фара самолета? или это чертовы инопланетяне прощупали мою задницу?
Утечки 4Chan с озвучкой
Самый невыносимый «телеведущий» в мире НЛО — Брэндон Фугал (RANT)
Петиция о прозрачности и подотчетности в отношении программ, связанных с UAP!
Опыт похищения инопланетянами Сью Джеймисон и ее двоих детей
Ричард Доти утверждает, что следующим разоблачителем после Дэвида Груша станет адмирал ВМС США.
MUFON Июньский информационный бюллетень Bombshell FOIA
Последние 9 секунд видео с карданного подвеса, стабилизированного по горизонту.
Теоретическая защита Министерства обороны держит в секрете обратный инжиниринг НЛО — диспозиция «Не в этот раз»
They also have stuff on shadow biospheres, quantum teleportation and other theories… I think it’s interesting to see what they are looking into in their speculations / research… They might be more on the money than your average Joe
Just really great SEO.
*Is this disclosure that Lovecraft was actually right?*
Probably paid Google to put it there
Lmao that’s hilarious
Spur of the moment, felt like firing a few questions off at Google to see what results I’d get. First search in, this is what I get. Does anyone else think it’s kinda weird that one of the first few results for this off-the-wall question would be a recent article from aerospace defense contractor Northrop-Grumman?
>[Article: Are aliens in the ocean? The answer may surprise you — or it won’t, since the chances of this sunken sea evidence being tied to extraterrestrials are slim to none. Still, it’s worth taking a deeper dive to discover exactly what’s down there and consider potential alien alternatives.](https://now.northropgrumman.com/aliens-in-the-ocean-is-sea-ing-believing/)
Why would Northrop-Grumman, of all organizations, be the ones saying this?
Check out this NG advertisement they put on Facebook where they ask if aliens are hiding among us…
https://fb.watch/ln6xW6h0Kk/?mibextid=v7YzmG
> Not surprisingly, [Avi Loeb’s] plan was met with skepticism. Why? First, there’s the fact that it’s exceedingly difficult to take accurate measurements of head-on speed before meteors crash into the atmosphere, meaning the object in question may not be interstellar. Second, any debris remaining after the impact would be extremely small — a few grams or less — and there’s no way to pinpoint a specific search area. In other words, this really is a needle in a haystack – or drop in the ocean – situation.
It’s not a good article, either.
The better question is why are you googling that
Because the article matched your search terms?
xposted to /r/usos