Сенатор США Марко Рубио: «Мы начали процесс» интервьюирования офицера американской разведки Дэвида Груша в ходе открытых слушаний. «Генеральный инспектор проверил Груша, счел его заслуживающим доверия, а затем направил его в Конгресс. Очевидно, что это зависит от председателя. [Mark Warner] решить, в каком направлении двигаться».
Похожие записи:
Запрос: 2011.03 Фукусима (сфера) НЛО
Белый шар 13.05.2022 Видеоанализ. Цифровой артефакт? МКС? Передняя фара самолета? или это чертовы инопланетяне прощупали мою задницу?
Утечки 4Chan с озвучкой
Самый невыносимый «телеведущий» в мире НЛО — Брэндон Фугал (RANT)
Развитая цивилизация в Антарктиде 🤯👽🛸
Взял в декабре 2020….
почему такие люди, как Луис Элизондо и Том Делонге, не арестованы или не «загадочно мертвы»?
Бывший подрядчик по обороне и разведке Майкл Виа рассказывает свою историю о том, как Лу Элизондо объяснил ему, как диск превращается в треугольник. и UAP в форме сигары летают, и почему с ними связаны огни и шары.
Трудно не скептически относиться к «Историческому пресс-событию Грира о раскрытии UAP / НЛО в Вашингтоне, округ Колумбия».
9 сентября 1991 года. Двое британцев показывают, что они находятся за кругами на полях.
#everyone call Mark Warner’s office
Phone: 202-224-2023 tell them you want David Grusch to testify in open hearing
Edit: thanks for all the bling, y’all! But more thanks for being here 💯💚
Edit: if you prefer email
https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=ContactPage
Holy shit, that is awesome! Werner better do right by the American people.
This is the time people, start calling Mark Werners office and demand he puts Grusch before the American people.
Edit: The phone number to his office is **202-224-2023**, I have made my call.
>Mr Rubio: «the gist of the whistleblower’s claim is, that there are programs that should have been notified to Congress that were not. So we’re gonna be interested in that no matter what the topic is.”
Exactly. 💯
if this weren’t NHI related it’d already be the biggest news story in the country. Nonstop 24/7 coverage and headlines: «is the US still a democracy or a shadowy junta?»
Submission Statement: A citizen journalist recently interviewed US Senator Marco Rubio. The topic of discussion was former US intelligence officer David Grusch. The senator and Congress vetted Grusch and found him credible. There could potentially be open hearing about the subject in the future.
ML: “Yeah? So you’re taking it credibly? Do you want to hear from him and others—behind closed doors? In the open?”
MR: “Well, we’ve begun that process. Obviously, it’s up to the chairman [Mark Warner] to decide what direction to go, but I know we’ve already begun that process. I think, he’s interviewed with staff already, so.”
This might be massive news holy shit. Open or closed hearing Congress is taking this extremely seriously.
«Found him credible». That is crazy big. Credible? Let’s think a moment of all the things he said. Personally I am a big skeptic of this whole thing, but… correct me if I am wrong, but this is as close as disclosure that we have ever gotten.
Rubio and Gillibrand are fucking legends
Left message
Wow. I called Warner’s office. I hope this moves along quickly.
I called and left an opinion
I’m about to call (assuming I’ll be leaving a message at this hour). This is literally the first time I’ve ever called a politician’s office (I prefer letters/emails and hate talking on the phone, but if this is more impactful, so be it). I drafted a script for myself and put it through Chat GPT to make it a bit more succinct. Decided to focus on the withholding of information/obstruction of oversight. Sharing here in case it’s helpful. I definitely borrowed from other folks’ scripts shared over the past few weeks.
Senator Mark R. Warner, Chair, Senate Intelligence Committee
As an American, I’m deeply concerned about the claims made by former US intelligence officer-turned-whistleblower David Charles Grusch. In an article published earlier this month in The Debrief, Mr. Grusch alleges that classified information has been deliberately withheld from Congress by certain members of the intelligence community, with the aim of obstructing legitimate oversight. He also states that his attempts to bring these concerns forward confidentially to the Department of Defense Inspector General resulted in illegal retaliation and reprisals, a complaint deemed «credible and urgent» by the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
Considering the credibility of the whistleblower, the supporting sources mentioned in The Debrief, and the track record of the journalists involved, I believe these claims should be treated with utmost seriousness.
I urge you to promptly investigate the whistleblower’s claims, ensure cooperation from the Department of Defense and other government agencies for a congressional investigation, and advocate for transparent and public hearings on this matter.
My message just sent:
Mr. Warner,
I believe it is of the up most importance that a hearing into the claims made by David Grusch regarding Special Access Programs with no congressional oversight be open to the PUBLIC. This issue is of the gravest importance to our democracy and the public has a right to the information and evidence to which Mr. Grusch has already testified to and been found credible and urgent by the IGIC.
As George Washington said “Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness.”
John F. Kennedy had similar beliefs when he stated “The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”
Reddit. Do your thing. Call, email, text, whatever it takes.
Everyone CALL!!!
Left a voicemail and sent an email. This should be pinned to all UAP-related subs and frankly we should be filling these voicemail boxes *every day.* Come on Reddit, let’s do the thing.
Title 50 or above- your safety first. Seek legal security. Then blow the whistle. Its your right. You guys are traumatised. You are the secret keeping victims who kept a fuckin secret for too long.
Well, Mick West says he is not credible so I’ll go with West over an inspector general and senators.
/S
[removed]
RUBIO is saying this? That’s huge! Burchett, Hawley are pretty fringe, but Rubio’s someone with a lot more stature. And if Gillibrand is discussing Grusch, thats a big deal too.
Dying to know what Rubio meant when he said “Urgent and Credible threat to the…”. Threat to the what, Marco!?”
Where’s this interview with Rubio?
Already left my call a few moments ago. Simply just emphsized how important this is to not only us as a community of UFO enthusiasts, but to everyone as an entire nation. That this can potentially have some serious implications on Democracy and governance, rule of law, etc. If there are proven SAPs, then I think that blowing the lid off of this thing will reveal the root cause to some of the issues that we currently face as a Democracy.
That was the gist of it. Oh, and emphasize that this will influence the way you vote in the future (mid-term and presidential).
Open OR Closed. Title is misleading.
It’s up to the chairman.
I feel like the people who have been hiding it already know that and have known that. I’m definitely hoping for the best though
It’s a beautiful thing
D I S C L O S U R E
Rubio has been great on this from the beginning. Open hearings in front of senate intel would be a major turning point on public interest and perception of this subject
I wrote a message and left a phone call requesting it to be an open hearing.
I love how some random chairman in bumfuck US gets to decide which direction this is going to go.
Thank you, everyone who is taking part in this situation and making disclosure happen. As a member of the EU, i can not take part in this, so I want to let you guys know that the rest of the world is with you. Keep pushing people for everyone in this planet. Thank You again!
We can all breathe easier now, Little Marco is on the case!