Заявление Груша разрешено к публикации (4/4/23)
Похожие записи:
Моя ночь в одиночестве в таверне «Древний баран»: Индивидуальная охота за привидениями
Возможная сфера УАП во время российского обстрела?
Старлинк?
Скептицизм и великое открытие
(Доктор Шон Киркпатрик) сказал: «У нас нет убедительных доказательств того, что что-либо из этого имеет внеземное происхождение». … свидетели звонили мне после, и они такие: «Какого хрена !?» Они такие: «О чем он говорит? Мы сказали ему названия программ, над чем работали!» Они были в гневе!
Карлос Де Лос Сантос, инцидент с НЛО, если он подлинный, явно представляет собой преднамеренные учения в реальном мире, проводимые нечеловеческими интеллектами, чтобы проверить их способности в преследовании и захвате человеческого летательного аппарата.
Что такое «рукотворные миражи»?
Бывший подрядчик по обороне и разведке Майкл Виа рассказывает свою историю о том, как Лу Элизондо объяснил ему, как диск превращается в треугольник. и UAP в форме сигары летают, и почему с ними связаны огни и шары.
Создайте таблицу со всеми наиболее интересными заявлениями Боба Лазара и поставьте шкалу от 1 до 10, чтобы они были правдой.
Офис по разрешению аномалий во всех доменах ищет заместителя директора, так как приближается крайний срок в пятницу — подведение итогов
Where are the other pages 🫤
Bottom line … the DoD IG leaked Grusch’s name when he privately reported that certain SAPs were outside Congressional oversight (the ones having to do with reverse-engineering UFOs and with NHIs), and someone in the DoD retaliated against him (mostly some of Grusch’s security clearances were revoked, with no explanation).
So Grusch filed a whistleblower complaint to the ICIG, and ultimately he gave a closed-door 11-hour testimony, under oath, to Congress about it all.
This all happened over the last two years, and we learned about it over the last few days when he went public with it all.
Please correct me if wrong. It looks like this was lifted by Mick West by taking a screen shot from a sequence on the recent Nation news coverage?
I’m definitely going to start calling it a «performing a public domain literature review» when I google stuff.
The language here makes me laugh. It reads like one of those “record skip, freeze frame” moments from a movie.
“You might be wondering how I got myself into this mess. Well, we have to start at the beginning…”
It’s just such informal language in what I would suppose is meant to be a very official document? Phrasing like “my boss” instead of “my direct supervisor, _____”
If this isn’t true, I have one question for you: Why did they change the terminology from «aerial» to «anomalous?»
You know our government and military deals in specifics. You know that the words they use mean things, specific things.
Why did they switch their language to «NHI» instead of extraterrestrials or aliens?
For a government document, the nomenclature and overall wording seems clunky. Not to mention it’s not even in the typical MFR format. How do we know this is real? Unless they took the actual document and paraphrased it, hence the lack of professionalism
What is Mick getting at? That the other pages will have references to people like Lue and Hal Putoff? Ross (and the other folks «behind» Grusch) seems to be downplaying his association with the players we already know.
This is fake. He’s listed on government website as making captain in 2019
SS: Mick posted this yesterday on twitter and I hadn’t seen it linked here yet. [https://twitter.com/MickWest/status/1668745125793771522](https://twitter.com/MickWest/status/1668745125793771522)
He’s calling out Ross and anyone else who has access to this to publish the other pages, which seems fair. I would like to see what the rest of it says.
Any idea where Grusch got his bachelors? I’ve tried searching everywhere for a record but nothing comes up.
Coulthart, Kean and Blumenthal need to explain to everyone why they haven’t released the entire statement. The fact that we only have this single page and it had to be pulled as a screenshot from the video segment is inexcusable. This is crucial information for understanding exactly what DOPSR approved for Grusch to say publicly.
People keep giving the excuse that DOPSR has not been «read in» as the reason they approved these statements for release. The twitter account associated with Elizondo’s PR guy loves that line.
DOPSR is not «read in» on things. I’m sure they have clearance to a point when researching requests but in cases where they do not, they refer it to the classifying authority of the subject matter in question who gives an approval to DOPSR without DOPSR ever having been «read in». Anyone pushing that line is clueless.
The only way this would not come up on DOPSR’s radar would be if it was totally off the books ie not a legal program or an illegal program buried within a legal one. I imagine that would mean run entirely by a defense contractor.
I really wish Dave was asked why he thought his request to talk about this was approved if its so highly classified. His answer on that would be very telling I think.
The language used is so childish. Makes you wonder about his education in physics and astronomy.
So, to sum it up, no actual details beyond: «they didn’t like that I was asking»
This confirms everything.
Who cleared it for release. That might give you a sense of where the following pages are heading.
I have to scrutinise the authenticity of this document, I don’t think it’s the real one. There’s some awful grammar and spelling mistakes in this. This reads as someone trying far too hard to sound official.
This whole situation is so confusing and unclear, there’s a better chance of aliens landing on the Whitehouse lawn than unpacking this cluster fuck of legal process, «credible» whistleblowers, and poor grammar in a written statement by said whistle-blower that reads as a prologue to «Aliens: A story about Aliens» book he’s probably about to release.
this whole situation is gonna make the UFO community appear even more crazy and now everyone is gonna argue that this was a conspiracy theory to discredit the UFO community.
It’s a negative feedback loop of disinformation, news ratings, and enthusiasts all jerking each other off over sweet nothings.
It’s not a good look, he joined the UAPTF after already becoming a UFO believer and doing a “public literature domain review”… he’s just another one of us
Scroll down past the video to see a lot larger list of documents [https://www.weaponizedpodcast.com/episodes-1/episode-number-21](https://www.weaponizedpodcast.com/episodes-1/episode-number-21)
Edit: I just read the documents about his whistleblowing and all it basically said was he reported stuff to his boss and they didnt report it to Congress as they should have…
This proves nothing at all about ufos and aliens… It just talks mainly about what his role was and some doors was slammed hard in his face… lol
Just show us some pictures already!
I’m new to this sub and a believer in UFO’s as I saw one defy gravity in 1994. Where do I start with this David Grusch stuff? I have a platform on YT I want to use to talk about this story but I don’t know where to start on this whistle-blower. Can someone direct me? Thanks so much!!!
«Cleared for open publication» by Department of defense office of republication and security review. Does that mean that this is a state sponsored narrative?
Where’s the other pages
Grusch: come buy my new expose !
I would love to read that, but it’s so blurry it’s giving me a headache.
So basically he has the same infos like us, just with the pics and stuff, only he has them on a government PC or by someone telling him. But isn’t it weird that it seems we know a lot basically, because so much leaked over the years and was just Psy oped so heavily, no one believed the story’s.
This makes his story and the phenomenon even more credible, many infos got out all along.
Didn’t you hear Mr Grusch? Curiosity killed the cat.
Where’s the rest of it?
This is it guys
«Under the noise-floor»?
I am definitely going to have to use that in my next staff meeting.
This doesn’t say anything! What’s with this phony BS??!!!