Пилоты сообщают, что февральский объект на Аляске заклинил их приборы, Росс Култхарт намекает на неэффективность сбитых самолетов

Always had a funny feeling about these shoot downs…

Not to mention they show us a Russian and Chinese jet harassing US drones? And they had no problem releasing those ? Literally came out a day after it was reported. Good video too.

But they can’t show us these ???

Yeah.. something’s up. 🧐

Good scoop. Can you find the briefing where Kirby claimed they recovered nothing?

Again, this stinks to high heaven.

Watch header video for reports about what the pilots reported. I suspect that’s what Coulthart is referring to also when he says they don’t release the pilots after action reports even to Congress members with proper clearance.

[https://youtu.be/_KAV-nKB-L4?t=3378](https://youtu.be/_KAV-nKB-L4?t=3378)
**Coulthart’s Need To Know Podcast timestamped to the relevant discussion**

**The following is a transcript of the segment on the Need To Know Podcast:**

Let’s just roll back a bit. Lets go back to February. Lets talk about what happened over Deadhorse, Alaska, in February.

Now we know that three objects were allegedly shot down, we know that they were engaged with sidewinder missiles by fighter jets from the US Airforce, now what is so interesting is what I’m hearing about Deadhorse. And this is I think perhaps where questions could be pertinently directed, because although the particular Senator that I’m thinking of is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, they’re not a member of the Emerging Threats Committee, so lets just flag this to the Emerging Threats Committee, that we know that there is a Senator on the Armed Services Committee who has been approached by a member of the Airforce, asking the committee to ask more pointed questions about what happened over Deadhorse alaska, now I’m just going to read out a few questions that I think should be asked:

Why have no congressional representatives been given the opportunity to sight the purported shootdown videos shot by fighter jets in February during the multiple incursions over US airspace? And as we understand it, Senators and Representatives have been refused the opportunity to even view this vision in a secure SCIF.

Why the secrecy? Does the witness, Dr. Kirkpatrick, have any knowledge about the specific shootdown incident over or near Dead Horse, Alaska in February?

What exactly did the pilot report seeing when he engaged the object with a missile? Was the object seen to actually crash or descend as a result of that missile being fired?

**Why is vision of that particular incident still being kept classified, as well as the pilots after action report, even to confidential hearings of the relevant congressional committees?**

Is the witness prepared to deny the reports, that I’m hearing, that the object when hit by the explosion of the jet’s sidewinder missile actually stayed in the air despite that direct explosion?

Something was seen by the pilot to fall from the object he engaged, but I’m told, the main object was not in fact shot down by the missile.

Does the witness, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick deny, categorically, that this is the case?

**Now that we know Ross Coulthart has been speaking with Grusch for some time, and that Coulthart made these statements about the Deadhorse AK shootdown in February while Grusch still occupied his position in the Intelligence Community with the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, does anyone think that perhaps Coulthart was knowingly speaking of inside information gleaned from Grusch?**

**Articles about the object:**
https://www.voanews.com/a/us-shoots-down-mysterious-high-altitude-object-over-alaska-/6958106.html

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-shoots-high-altitude-object-alaska-white-house/story?id=97040022

**Article about search ending with nothing recovered:**

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/17/u-s-ends-search-for-objects-shot-down-over-alaska-lake-huron-00083559

**Interesting tidbits from the articles:**

Officials gave few details about the downed object.

There was “no indication, **at this time**, that it was maneuverable,” said the Pentagon press secretary, Air Force Brigadier General Patrick Ryder, speaking less than two hours after the object had been brought down.

«This was an object … it wasn’t an aircraft per se,” Ryder said, briefing Pentagon reporters. “We have no further details about the object at this time, including any description of its capabilities, purpose or origin.”

Kirby said the object was about the size of a small car and was at flying about 40,000 feet.

ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz first reported that when fighters were scrambled, the pilots did visuals, **got images** and said there was no sign the object had propulsion.

It was described as **»cylindrical and silver-ish gray»** and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said.

Asked if was «balloon-like,» the official said, «All I say is that it wasn’t ‘flying’ with any sort of propulsion, so if that is ‘balloon-like’ well — we just don’t have enough at this point.»

When asked by reporters at the White House about the object’s downing, Biden said only, «It was a success.»

That description of the object seems similar to this photo:

https://imgur.com/gallery/NM9vu9O

This was posted somewhere back in February or March…can’t remember whether I saw it here or 4chan (I’m leaning towards the latter) but the accompanying comment claimed it’s an image of the object that was shot down in Alaska.

I’ve never seen this image since. Anyone know what this is? I’m fully expecting it to be something super mundane rather than a potential UAP.

This whole thing seemed fishy to me. Obvious gaslighting going on.

There is a video of a Russian Pantsir trying to shoot down a UK Storm Shadow. The Storm Shadow has advanced built in ECM abilities.

The missile goes haywire as it approaches the cruisemissile and veers off. The Russians try and shoot it down twice.

All I am saying is this sounds like cover for DARPA basically running blue on blue tests .

Send up your super advanced drones. See if your own forces can shoot it down over some remote area ( no civvie casualties from a crash! ). Rinse, repeat.

The US had hypersonic interceptors in the 70s. The F-117 prototype began flying at the same time.

So we’re just going to pretend we just started tracking UAP and just started shooting them down..that’s what we’re going with? Lol at this rate we should have that technology 3-4 years

Disclosure is finally coming!!! All the blind idiots who had been laughing at people like us for decades are going to have egg in their faces. UFOs, ancient astronauts in Peru, Area 51, Colares, it was all true!!!

You mean China can jam radar? 🤯

Anybody have the link to the black and white video of what looks like a UFO being hit by a missile but not falling?