На мой взгляд, здравого смысла достаточно, чтобы исключить это видео как подделку (учитывая, что оно не *выглядит* очень правдоподобно), но, похоже, я в меньшинстве так думаю. Поэтому предлагаю вашему вниманию следующее доказательство. **Частота кадров эффекта «портала» не соответствует частоте кадров остального видеоряда!** Это означает, что эффект портала был наложен поверх другого видеоряда в видеоредакторе. И да, даже инопланетные технологии должны соблюдать частоту кадров. Так работают камеры… Вот замедленная версия клипа, где вы можете увидеть, о чем я говорю: [https://twitter.com/i/status/1689291489623277568](https://twitter.com/i/status/1689291489623277568) Можем ли мы сейчас покончить с этим вопросом? Тот факт, что мы уделяем столько внимания очевидной подделке, является пиком **рестигматизации**. Это дискредитирует тему и выставляет нас всех доверчивыми дебилами.
Похожие записи:
Awesome! Thanks for taking the time to examine and post. Need more people like you. I learned (from Captain Disillusion) that frame rate mismatch was always the tell-tale sign of video manipulation.
In the hearings they testified that these craft leave no thermal signature. These craft clearly have thermal signatures. I am a believer but this does seem questionable.
Morons live and die in ignorance and bliss.
If you think it’s stupid to investigate reports or videos or “evidence” whether it’s real or not, I don’t know what to tell you. That’s part of the work. You have to sift through it all or you’re never gonna learn anything.
I remain skeptical but I’m not calling it fake outright
I initially wanted to discredit this video, then came back intrigued, then thought it was stupid that everyone’s twisting their heads over it. Now I think it is actually really great that people are caught up in this! It feels like the subs are truly attempting to come together as a community and figure things out, regardless of its authenticity. It might be fake and there may be a lot of people saying stupid things, but being able to create a conclusion as a community provides a unified learning experience and a maturing of perspective for everyone. Its a hive mind intelligence test, and I’m here for it.
your link is broken but going frame by frame on the yt videos shows consistent fps between the «portal effect» and everything else on both drone and sat
>It discredits the topic and makes us all look like gullible morons.
What’s the angle here? Why is there a problem with debating videos that show up? If they can be debunked, let’s debunk them, but not because it’s «an obvious fake». Just because people are trying to find concrete reasons to debunk a video that seems obviously fake to you doesn’t make them morons.
Since you seem to know — What does it look like when an airliner is teleported?
It was posted elsewhere that the portal was an ink drop VFX. Who ever keeps pushing this disinformation needs to stop
He uses a camera to film a monitor that shows a clip filmed from a satelite.. would it not be weirder if the framerate accually synced perfectly?
Hittin’ all the subs with this one, huh? I don’t think it’s the evidence you hope it to be. I remain skeptical too.
In your opinion at what frame rate is a portal supposed to run? When you have seen one in the past was it instantaneous or was it slow motion or visible to your naked eye?
When you saw or have that reference to a “real portal” what evidence did you collect?
It’s kind of wild to me how many people can’t seem to understand the framerate issue.
The base video has X frames per second. The portal has Y frames per second.
Think of the video as the bottom layer, and on a separate layer there is the portal effect. If you start a VFX project with 2 clips, you have 3 framerates to worry about. FPS of the original footage, FPS of the effect, and FPS of the output file. If the fps of your VFX project is 60fps, your base footage is 24fps, and your effect is 30fps, it will look very clearly wrong, especially when played back in slow motion.
The solution is to always render your project using the same FPS as the lowest FPS footage, which the creator did not do.
So you believe a screen filmed with a phone is evidence that it’s fake? You can clearly se that the frame rate isn’t consistent and recording a screen with a phone will absolutely set the frame rate out of sync, because the screen has its fps and the camera has its fps 🤷🏼♂️ I’m not saying this isn’t fake, but there are really no evidence that says it is fake
The different framerate is due to the editing software used on that Twitter post.
Not to mention the lack of plumes from the engines, the fuel not showing up as colder than the rest of the plane, and military FLIR uses black and white not rainbow
It’s obviously fake because it’s a 9 year old video and NO ONE has posted it since until now!
No one brings up, «but what about the video of them teleporting that 777?» How is it that NONE of you believers bring up the ONE video that clearly shows aliens teleporting a plane?!
What did you guys just forget you had the smoking gun? OR was it posted 9 years ago, DEBUNKED and discarded?
Common sense points to one of these.
WRITE TO YOUR CONGRESSPERSON.
It only takes 10 minutes to find out who your state representative is, and then send them a quick email regarding UAP disclosure.
EVERYTHING ELSE IS A DISTRACTION.
EMAIL THEM.