НЛО Polaroid 1975 года, с датой на обороте. Мысли по этому поводу? Пришел детектив с места преступления во Флориде. У меня есть полная история об этом, что делает ее более достоверной.
Похожие записи:
Запрос: 2011.03 Фукусима (сфера) НЛО
Белый шар 13.05.2022 Видеоанализ. Цифровой артефакт? МКС? Передняя фара самолета? или это чертовы инопланетяне прощупали мою задницу?
Утечки 4Chan с озвучкой
Самый невыносимый «телеведущий» в мире НЛО — Брэндон Фугал (RANT)
Развитая цивилизация в Антарктиде 🤯👽🛸
Взял в декабре 2020….
почему такие люди, как Луис Элизондо и Том Делонге, не арестованы или не «загадочно мертвы»?
Бывший подрядчик по обороне и разведке Майкл Виа рассказывает свою историю о том, как Лу Элизондо объяснил ему, как диск превращается в треугольник. и UAP в форме сигары летают, и почему с ними связаны огни и шары.
Трудно не скептически относиться к «Историческому пресс-событию Грира о раскрытии UAP / НЛО в Вашингтоне, округ Колумбия».
9 сентября 1991 года. Двое британцев показывают, что они находятся за кругами на полях.
Polaroids have a smooth, glossy finish. Why does this photo have a canvas-like texture?
u/Equipoize all you need to do to prove that this image is not fake is acquire another angle of this polaroid preferably holding it in your hand. It is a start and its certainly easier to get on your side because we all want it to be true. You should already know why people on the internet are untrusting as all of these types pf things are way to easy to fake using AI or even photoshop with the correct skills. So do us all a favour and prove yourself and whoever sent/ took the picture
Looks like [*Flight of the Navigator*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbuOHKlvtz8&ab_channel=MajorGrin)*.*
I love this because it makes me think the aliens’ dads helped build their ships in the garage, like humans do with go carts.
What cracks me up with craft is that they don’t care about symmetry and proportion 😆 you give a designing task to any engineer and they would use tools and careful measurements, and aliens just give you an irregular shape and you have to deal with it 💁🏻♂️
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn’t.”
Mark Twain
Did Polaroids in 75 have this canvas look? Serious question
Looks like a clam
«If aliens exist and are visiting Earth, Why aren’t there clear photos of UFOs?»
*Shows clear photo of UFO*
«CGI. AI. FAKE.»
It’s from the Pistachio galaxy.
This is a hat
Perspective is iffy… If it’s far away then it’s way too big, just looks like a small object up close.
Doesn’t this fit the description of the Alaska pilot UFO? Walnut shape?
Looks like one of those old sun hats 👒 flung in the air
I want to nitpick the shit out of this but I got nothin’
Why does the UFO look like it is on canvas?
Are the dark spots in the craft damages in the photograph or are they part of the actual photo?
I believe that’s a picture of a picture of a polaroid. All the skeptics in here I don’t think have really put their hands on that many old pictures and haven’t had their moms send them close up pictures of pictures from their iphones lol. Polaroids have that texture but it’s like inside the envelope. Whether or not it was staged we’ll never know but just want to say it’s clear to me that this is a polaroid or an incredibly impressive fake.
source: graphics professional
You can barely make out the brushstrokes.
This is probably the best picture I have seen.
That’s a hat…
I mean it looks fake
Looks like a janky ass UFO. Must have been the poor aliens on vacation
If there is no symmetry, thats because they don’t use aerodinamcs
From what I can see it looks very organic. Like a teardrop. And besides the 2 dark circles underneath it looks like a set of windows encircling the bulging upper portion when u zoom in. So maybe it’s a teardrop shaped object that is facing us. And if it has windows then it’s likely human tech back engineered.
That’s one of ours
totally fake. polaroid lenses mostly are wide angle ones. this one smells like 50mm or longer. then there’s the exposure. polaroid cameras either have very basic meter, or a fullly manual one. this image is high contrast so if u look at the bottom photo, the front of that bush(?) is very dark. that flying saucer should have been very dark too. my bullshit meter is going through the roof right now
1st this doesn’t look like a polaroid picture.
2nd this looks like it’s ML generated.
3rd we used to do this with peanut shells as kids. Polish it with some fine sand paper, use a large enough focusing lense and a collimating one at the camera and bam! You have yourself a UFO. Or very large eggball falling on the city.
The scene is backlit and more exposed for the sky than anything else, the detail of the UFO should have the same detail as the trees/bushes I.E. a shadow should be cast over the side of the UFO facing the photographer making if not all, at least the bottom half of it as dark as the bushes.
The only way this could be real is if dodge and burn was used during development (which would mean it’s not a directly taken polaroid), or there was another light source behind the camera but higher than the UFO (because the top is brighter than the bottom) illuminating just the UFO and not the bushes, or the UFO is self illuminated.
To me it looks sus at best.
Sorry, if this is all there is it’s not proof of anything. To me it looks like 2 different shaped bedroom room light dish slapped together and tossed into the air. The common person didn’t have a camera on the spot, and it was very rare did we ever have one at home even, at least with film in it, that was a holiday thing.
Looks just like that object that pilot flew by on twitter
It’s a fricking sun hat. You can see the metal eyelets on the underside. The only thing, if anything, this is evidence of is somebody running over Gilligan.
I used to do a lot of stuff with Polaroid. That looks like a tear (flap) in the emulsion layer.