Министр обороны Канады о цилиндрическом объекте, сбитом 11 февраля 2023 года над Канадой

От admin #Внеземные существа, #Внекосмические существа, #Внешний вид пришельцев, #Загадки инопланетного воздействия, #Загадки инопланетных цивилизаций, #Инопланетная жизнь, #Инопланетные существа в кино, #Инопланетные технологии, #ИнопланетныеВоздействия, #Инопланетяне, #ИнтеракцияСИнопланетянами, #Интракосмические существа, #Исследование инопланетной жизни, #Контакт с инопланетянами, #Космические пришельцы, #Межзвездные путешествия, #Научная фантастика, #Популярные о пришельцах, #Пришельцы в алфавите, #ПришельцыВНауке, #ПришельцыИлюди, #связанные с пришельцами, #Способы общения с пришельцами, #Телешоу на инопланетянах, #Теории заговоров о пришельцах, #Уроки инопланетной истории. 窗体顶端 窗体底端 ЭкспериментыПришельцев, #Фантастические инопланетяне, #Фильмы о пришельцах, #Фэндом пришельцев, #Экзобиология, #ЭкспериментыНадЛюдьми, #Явления


Министр обороны Канады о цилиндрическом НЛО, который был сбит 11 февраля 2023 года над Канадой: «На данный момент у нас нет никаких дополнительных подробностей об объекте, кроме того, что он выглядит как небольшой цилиндрический объект и меньше того, который был сбит у побережья Канады. Северная Каролина», «Почему мы ничего не слышали об этом объекте, что это было, где кадры этого объекта?

Canadian Defense Minister on Cillindrical object that was shot down on February 11th 2023 over Canada
byu/PerfectReplacement36 inUFOs

От admin

33 комментарий для “Министр обороны Канады о цилиндрическом объекте, сбитом 11 февраля 2023 года над Канадой”
  1. The half baked theory I’ve had about this all is as follows;

    Someone protected by whistleblower laws came forward, maybe Grusch or someone who directly worked on one of these programs. They told congress «*This is what they’ve developed, this is where they are tested, and this is who you want to talk to*.»

    So congress goes to, Lockheed for example and says «the jig is up, show us the advances you’ve made with- Door slammed in face.

    So the government, angry about being told to fuck off then uses their prior information to run a few ops and literally just shoot down and steal some of this tech they couldn’t legally get.

    I’m not talking a fully functional tic-tac, or anything of the sort. Just something that is bleeding edge, 10 years ahead of the rest; perhaps due to some insight in material science based on UFO research. Something congress wants a better look at.

    I don’t know how plausible any of this is. However the oddity of this whole situation begs many questions.

    One of the representatives said something like; «I am using the word object for a specific reason.» While everyone wanted to say balloons.

    The descriptions don’t really sound like balloons.

    The whole Alaska thing where they said the weather was too bad, but oil worker out there had video of that day with planes all around and beautiful weather. Whatever was going on there, they were flat out lying to the public about the weather and their efforts out there.

    We got HD video of that first actual balloon being taken down, but we can’t even get an solid intel on what these other things were.

    It’s a weird situation.

  2. I remember watching this live. It was either this press briefing or an earlier one where she gave details about the recovery operation. She stated something along the lines of, «We have X (where X is the type of reconnaissance aircraft) planes in the air circling the recovery zone. We WILL recover this object.»

    Then we hear the weather excuse along with «difficult terrain».

  3. Cylindrical? Something common? Somethong weird?
    Anyhow.
    We may frame a bigger picture. NHI? I say welcome. Aliens? Cool. Any ants doing their daily business in a gutter in front of a walmart are the same mystical wonder as aliens. They are here? They are advanced? They are like some Superheroes or so? Okay. Wow. We still have to feed our kids tomorrow.

    Anyhow.
    If there is something — talk.

    The whistleblowers should seek for security first. Personal safety is first.
    I see only one opportunity- for the greater good or the minimizing of suffering.
    Secret knowers title 50 or so or above- they are traumatised. No matter if they are government, Lockheed Marin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman or Bigelows Aerospace or so.
    They need legal and psychological help.
    They are victims too.
    Maybe they can talk then.
    For our next generations.
    The kids have an emotional right to know how their world works and how to frame a bigger picture of existence.
    Its weird, its hard, but its just life.

  4. awww, should have included a little more of the clip where the military dude next to her pops on and says it’s a balloon after she spent so much time saying they were not calling it a balloon.

    One of the funniest moments of this whole thing.

  5. Here is my theory:

    A Chinese balloon flew over the U.S., POTUS didn’t have it shot down and lots of people got angry, he gave a valid reason, the balloon might fall in a populated area and it wasn’t really hurting anything. To save face he ordered it shot down after leaving any potential populated areas (over the ocean) and just before it left U.S. airspace.

    The media and public outcry got NORAD to start looking at all similar objects of unknown origin and they start shooting down everything they could find for a few days. After they shot down a couple hobby balloons they realized that it was dumb to chuck expensive missiles at would likely be a never ending problem so they stopped.

    Canada is a joint member of NORAD and needed to say and do something, especially since this particular object was shot down over Canada, probably after crossing over Alaska. So they made their face saving statement, but in reality, finding a balloon that you shot down in the wilderness of Canada is like finding a needle in a very, very large haystack.

    This isn’t a proper crash retrieval program, this face saving and the ineptitude of government.

  6. Oh, they’ll just say it part of a satellite upon re-entry or some plausible variation thereof.
    What she’s not saying is that if they do conclude it’s not from “here” will they share their find with other nations and the general public at large? If you were to ask her that she’d mostly likely say, “The discovery may have implications for national security and must therefore remain within the domain of the security services but we’ll keep you posted”.

  7. All of it was just a trial run. To see precisely how the general public would react to shot down objects and this dominating the news cycle for a few days. This was a dry run. They know the public is dumb enough to just let it go after a few days and not think about it again (except for us) so they got the data they wanted for when they actually “recover” a craft

  8. I think they were a diversion tactic and were made visible for the military to shoot down and recover so that when all the whistle blowers finally come out they can claim see yeah just advanced balloons nothing to see here and start another stigma campaign.

  9. I’ve been thinking about a subspecies of the homo genus that possibly has chosen to stay in the shadows, they would be considered NHI aswell, chat gpt says it’s possible

    It is theoretically possible for a subspecies to exist within a species without scientists being aware of it. Subspecies are populations within a species that have distinct characteristics but can still interbreed. However, discovering and officially classifying a new subspecies typically requires extensive research and evidence. Scientists continuously explore and study biodiversity, but the process of identifying and validating new subspecies can be complex and time-consuming. So while it is possible, it is less likely that an unknown subspecies of a well-studied species like Homo sapiens would exist without scientific awareness.

  10. I wonder what would happen if a group of sophisticated hackers presented an offer to «out» all the senior execs personal info to the general public? I think the term is called doxing? (I could be mistaken) – Companies like, say, Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon, and Battelle, among others in the identified MIC club.

    Would a chess move like that force some of those spineless twits to come forward and spill the beans, not wanting to lose their tax payer funded year end bonuses?

    I mean, the MIC have resorted to corporate espionage, lies, deceit, stealing, and dare I say, murder, to keep their secrets, all at the U.S. taxpayer’s expense I might add. And we do live in a world of information at our fingertips filled with so many talented young minds. **We the People** could play hardball too, right?

    Of course I’m not advocating for this. As an elder statesman, I know better, especially on a platform that tramples on the 1st Amendment without batting an eye. I’m just asking the simple question; why has this has not happened already?

    Seems to me like it might increase the pressure on the dam that is visibly cracked and leaking.

    But hey, what do I know?

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *