Природа «высших измерений» pt. 2

What he said was a bit garbled but I thought he seemed to imply that the existence of dimensions beyond 3D + Time was confirmed but he may have just been saying they exist in theory and you can make them work mathematically.

My understanding is that there’s never been any actual experimental evidence for extra dimensions so maybe he knows something we don’t or, again, he was just speaking about the existence of the theories.

Nice post. I posted something similar a few days ago, but yours has a lot more detail about brane cosmology.

Particularly appreciate the links to the Brian Greene papers, I hadn’t seen those.

Maldecena wrote an interesting paper on human traversible wormholes in the RS model.

The nature of “Higher Dimensions” and UAP

Since the whistle blower David Grusch mentioned that these objects could be “inter dimensional” I’d like to elucidate what that means and do away with any misconceptions:

In popular culture and pseudoscience, the term «higher dimensions», often conjures up images of mystical realms or alternate realities. However, in the context of brane cosmology and string theory, the concept of extra dimensions is rooted in rigorous scientific theories and mathematical frameworks and simply refers to an extra-space coordinate.

Typically we think of the universe as being a 4D space-time being composed of 3 dimensions of space and 1 of time (X,Y,Z + time). In the context of string theory and brane cosmology- extra dimensions refer to the existence of additional spatial dimensions beyond these familiar three.

An example would be having 4 space coordinates and one time coordinate. (X,Y,Z,W + time) — this would be a 5D space-time

In these theories, there are essentially two methods of including extra dimensions in ways that fit our observations of reality, though they aren’t always mutually exclusive: Branes & Compactification.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9906064.pdf

Firstly, In string theory, the extra dimensions are postulated to be compactified or curled up. This means that these dimensions are incredibly tiny and hidden from our direct observation. They are hypothesized to be curled up at such small scales (10^-35 meters) that we cannot detect them with our current technology or senses.

These compactified dimensions are often represented mathematically as a Calabi-Yau manifold, which is a complex and intricate shape. The vibrational modes of tiny strings in string theory depend on the shape and size of these extra dimensions. The specific way in which these strings vibrate determines the properties of particles, such as their masses and the forces they experience — there’s a lower bound of 10^500 different shapes for the C-Y manifold, and an upper bound of 10^272,000 different shapes for the C-Y manifold — our universe and it’s physical laws correspond to just one of them.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10625

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0302219.pdf

Now, let’s discuss brane cosmology. Branes are higher-dimensional objects that can exist within the framework of string theory. They can be thought of as «sheets» or «membranes» on which *particles and forces can be confined.* In this context, our observable universe is often considered to be a brane, sometimes referred to as a «3-brane» since it spans three spatial dimensions and is embedded in a larger 4 dimensional space.

These large extra dimensions, sometimes referred to as «warped» or «brane-world» scenarios, can have profound implications for particle physics and gravity. According to these models, the effects of gravity can become diluted in the extra dimensions, making it appear weaker compared to the other fundamental forces. This can offer an explanation for why gravity appears significantly weaker in our observable universe when compared to the other forces — offering an explanation to the Hierarchy Problem.

To imagine this we can think of it as Standard Model particles being confined to (X,Y,Z + time) while gravity can move in all coordinates (X,Y,Z,W + time).

https://web.stanford.edu/~savas/papers/LargeExtraDimensions.pdf

These ideas attempt to unify QM & GR by speculating on the existence of the “graviton” the theorized quanta of gravity. If aliens have existed for thousands or millions of years longer than us as a technological power — and have craft capable of jumping interstellar distances on relatively short order — some deeper understanding of reality would probably be needed. Something like unifying QM & GR.

Here are a few papers by physicist Brian Greene on the notion of faster than light signaling in the context of brane cosmology:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.09014.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.13590.pdf

Exotic Material? :

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0201191.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0206187.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.2318.pdf

Other Resources:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9906064.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0202044.pdf

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_problem

https://youtu.be/4TI1onWI_IM

https://youtu.be/4URVJ3D8e8k

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

https://youtu.be/3WL_vtu4r1w

https://youtu.be/mmtLgYVEuJs

So why do they use a craft of one shape and not one that can become many different shapes? And why would they bother coming to our dimension? We don’t care about 2d worlds, why would they care about 3d worlds?

Do any of you know about any 2D space? We live and are bound by 3 dimensions. And yet we don’t know any 2D spaces or 2D beings

But it’s just assumed that 4D beings can just pop in and out of our 3D space?

Also see this video, «[4D Toys: a box of four-dimensional toys, and how objects bounce and roll in 4D](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t4aKJuKP0Q),» which tries to show how we would perceive 4D toys in three dimensions.

Here’s one of the relevant DIRDs produced under AATIP/AAWSAP: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_13-DIRD_Warp_Drive_Dark_energy_and_the_Manipulation_of_Extra_Dimensions.pdf

Now I know why they didn’t tell anything yet. It’s incomprehensible

Thank you for bringing Stringtheory and especially Branes to this.
Thank you for your Post.

Yes, people are using the term “dimension” entirely wrong here. The word “dimension” has a very specific physical and mathematical definition.

What people mean when they are saying dimension is “parallel universe”, as a component of the multiverse. So, this explanation doesn’t do much to address the sort of thing they are going for, except in the sense that M-theory does provide a brane cosmology multiverse. Other types of multiverses would include an Everett “Many Worlds” interpretation of quantum mechanics (which I personally reject because it violates parsimony in the most hilarious way possible), and the physicist Max Tegmark’s “mathematical universe/multiverse”, with is more Platonic or Pythagorean in origin, is quite an interesting concept and similar to that shown in the book *Anathem* (the plot of which involves a spaceship that originated from a parallel world in this sort of Platonic multiverse).

I would just try to think of 2D vs 3D. Imagine a creature whose universe is confined to a line and we are observing them. If we are not in that line they can’t see us

What do you do for work OP ?

Mathematics professor who’s expertise was the Fourth Dimension (mathematically speaking). “If you took all the moments I actually understood the 4th dimension, in my 25 years of teaching, it be about 15 minutes. “

If in fact there are “inter dimensional beings”, did these beings evolve naturally to be able to comprehend a 4th dimension, or did they learn to comprehend the 4th dimension after they became an advanced civilization?