тлдв; Он скептически относится к Грушу. Возможно, тот факт, что министерство обороны уполномочило его говорить об этом, в то время как они активно блокировали информацию, говорит о том, что это психологическая операция. Очень хорошие часы, как обычно.
Похожие записи:
СИЛЬНО УЛУЧШЕНО
Команда спецэффектов «Титаника» не верила, что это может быть компьютерная графика. (Лас Ломас, Мексика, 1997 г.) Может показаться странным, что такая продвинутая технология раскачивается, как будто она свисает с веревки, но это может произойти во время внесения определенных корректировок. Движения внутри не чувствуется.
Отчеты пилотов-испытателей Зоны 51 перекликаются с теорией одноразового корабля 4chan
Как имплантация микрочипов умирающим обезьянам поможет людям?
Спорт как предмет национальной гордости. Популизм связан с такими событиями.
Самые большие тайны Антарктиды
Что на самом деле скрывает губернатор Арканзаса?
Призрачная частота: действительно ли она работает?
Комментарий к записи «Таинственная сумочка богов: изображенная Мэри в Шумере, Америке и Гёбекли-Тепе»
Обзор: тур «Uncanny: I Know What I Saw», The Pavilion, Bath
Well he’s skeptical over everything that isn’t disclosed to him via FOIA so no surprise there. I think he does good work but he has trouble contextualizing things that come out like this.
It’s a bit OTT for a psyop..
I don’t see the reason for adverse reactions to John’s comments. Like he said, if it’s the truth, it will prevail. But naivity could cost us, it’s win/win to be open but healthily skeptical. In a nutshell:
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
The game ain’t over till it’s over.
If DOD is not running a psyop involving congress by having an agent purposely mislead congress to trick the American people
I like Johns work, but the idea this is a psyop is laughable and ridiculous.
The DOD let him release the info, because he’s not the only one coming forward making these exact claims and these others are also having their claims vetted by the DOD .
They know it is going to get out , and this way , they can attempt to control a potential Pandora’s box situation, from their point of view
«Exploring» the story but choosing to only include comments from known disinformation practitioner Susan Gough and grifters like UFOJOE. Many others have come out of the woodwork trying to claim involvement with the story as well (see Greenstreet).
Why not take the time to speak about the credible supporters? The article mentions numerous high ranking DoD officials, Elected government officials and corresponding supporting tweets.
You could have even taken the approach of saying «This would be amazing if true and you all know that I have already starting compiling an extensive list of FOIA requests to uncover additional details.» Your followers would have loved that response, but instead It was just an attack.
I believe this is the most revealing take on the entire story I’ve heard (or read) anywhere. Kudos, John u/BlackVault — the two items you highlighted are of particular interest to me: The clearing of his statements with DOPSR and his connections with JG, GK, LE and TUJ
The main point that sticks with me: He had all his interview questions/answers pre-screened by the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR) who certified that *he was revealing nothing classified.*
If he had revealed anything that was secret he would have been charged and arrested for revealing classified information. Period. Just like the US has done with prior leakers/whistleblowers. 18 U.S.C. 798(a)(3) Willful Communication of Classified Intelligence Information to an Unauthorized Person
Do you even sleep John? I went to sleep when your live-premier started airing.. Now I’m back and you’re still actively responding 😀
Anyway, thanks for the great work as always!
But the going theory is the UAP projects did not exist officially and from th external security classification from the Pentagon, the projects that served as the shells were the only ones known about officially. So Grusch couldn’t talk about those. Seems like to the Pentagon the UAP projects don’t exist ?
What I will not understand is, if it was psyops then why would DoD obviously make it look like one ? Maybe the approval shows that this is the first step at disclosure ?
[removed]
Why tf do people give John shit for asking questions…. The guy has the most level headed and analytical response to these type of claims, and people demand we all fall in line to believe without any evidence.