Анализ данных военного радара — MH370 — Высота и скорость указывают на НЛО — Является ли это неопровержимым доказательством?

Let me help explain this chart real simple. The move from 36,000 ft to 58,000 is impossible for this plane… with passengers and cargo, hell even without. The drop from 58k to 5k is impossible the plane is torn apart. Can’t explain the rest of the flight path? Makes no sense… except contrails are made at 25,000 ft, like in the videos.

The Conclusion of the Report itself is in these words

//Based on the Malaysian Military data, a reconstruction of the profile was conducted on a Boeing 777 simulator. Figure 1.1B (below) in chart form shows the Profile Chart of Data from Malaysian Military Radar. Some of the speed and height variations were not achievable even after repeated simulator sessions.// page 6

They basically admit what that Radar shows is impossible to achieve! The report is very detailed and it’s a very interesting read. I am still going through it is quite lengthy

58000 feet. That’s insane. Anything higher than 43100 could lead to a catastrophic failure of the aircraft.

Oh god the credibility of footage gets more real by the day. This shit is SPOOKY.

[deleted]

So this is directly after radar was lost? Do they have the 5 minutes before this, I’d like to see if they show anything happening when signal is lost, right now between what I’m reading, it seems like it had a drone tailing it (they thought is lag/ghost) then they end up tracking the drone or ufo when the planes signals are lost at 17:21:13

I did not know this. That sudden elevation change at a ridiculous 890ft/sec is not even a plane falling out of the sky; it’s as if someone held the plane and tossed it downwards like a toy. The plane would have been ripped to pieces. With the UFO scenario in mind, imagine the orbs surrounding the plane and causing it to climb and then suddenly «*zooppp»* dropping (or maybe even instantly teleporting it) to 4800 ft, and then again it happens later on, this time the plane vanishing for good. The interference, the comms being disabled, sounds a little fishy to be due to a fire onboard, though it’s definitely possible. I keep thinking about the hours the plane flew towards the Indian Ocean. What exactly is happening there? Is it possible the UFO already had «control» of the plane and the tracking of the plane wasn’t typical airplane tracking at that point?

Cool info. Any experts here. Of the parts found is it possible that these parts fell off because the plain is moving at speeds that would cause these parts to fall off ? Rather than the result of a crash

How does this compare to the actual movement of the plane in the video?

So, you are proposing that it’s more likely that aliens teleported the plane 15,000ft lower, than the data being wrong?

Is that the reasoning behind it being a ‘smoking gun’?

On the data that shows 15,000ft descent in 24 seconds, presumably it tracked it the entire way? Or is that just the next ‘ping’ 24 seconds later. Because if it tracked it the whole way, that seems to prove that the data can’t be right, teleportation or not.

No, it certainly is not the «smoking gun evidence.»

It’s extreme and rare in nature but not impossible and jets have done similar descents when done intentionally, even as recently as last year (see China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 below).

If the pilot were suicidal and, being a pilot with a flight simulator at home, was interested in seeing how extreme he could go with a jet one last time to push it to its limits before later ending things, then it’s not impossible with our current knowledge of physics the way most UAP manuevers are.

This is the type of post that thousands of people upvote simply because they don’t understand it, it’s a lot of data to take in, and they just assume it’s confirming their beliefs for those reasons, so I’ll simplify here, which you should have done in a separate area to dumb it down for them:

**Ops argument:**
MH370 points to UAP behaviors because it demonstrated a sudden descent rate of ***36,540 feet per minute (609 feet per second).***

**My argument in response:**
In 2022, China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 was intentionally pushed nose-down by the pilot in a suicide-murder and demonstrated a sudden descent rate of ***31,000 feet per minute (516 feet per second).***
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Eastern_Airlines_Flight_5735](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Eastern_Airlines_Flight_5735)
Footage of that descent:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q1AUxMMROo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q1AUxMMROo)

For those who will get picky and try to argue about the very slight difference in speed here, Flight MH370 was a Boeing 777 that is larger and faster than a Boeing 737 (Flight 5735).
777 (Flight MH370) = Mach 0.84 to Mach 0.89
737 (Flight 5735) = Mach 0.78 to Mach 0.82

Yeah but if UFOs vanished the jet, nobody would fly and it would cause f-ing chaos.

Why are you ignoring that the report actually says that **”it was highlighted to the team that the altitude and speed extracted by the data are subject to inherent error”**?

I mean…the report acknowledges that this is likely an error. I don’t know much about the validity of that as this is not my field of expertise, but I routinely (like literally on a daily basis) run into this sort of thing while practicing medicine. I get a test result, it seems unusual, and then I have to think: *what is the likelihood that this result is real? What is the sensitivity and specificity of this test? What is the likelihood of a false positive or negative? What is the likelihood that I can interpret this test reliably?*

No test is free of error. It is a logical fallacy to work against that assumption. So here we have a result that makes no sense with the physical capabilities of an aircraft, and an official report commenting that the data is known to be unreliable anyways…it’s rather illogical to then assume that the only explanation is that it is real and that a UFO explains the discrepancy. If we function on that sort of logic, then we will never find true evidence of ANYTHING because all data will be “evidence” of *something*. If something doesn’t fit, the solution is not to shoehorn it into your hypothesis, or to modify your hypothesis to fit the (likely erroneous) data. That’s not how you do science. That’s not how any of this works.

*However*, if there were *other* lines of evidence that supported this data actually being accurate, then that would be a different story. Like, say, the government coming out and saying the orb video is legit, and that the plane was teleported to a completely different location sequentially. But until then, you have data that doesn’t fit the most plausible reality, and it’s a problem to take that at face value.

That’s just bad radar data. Could it have been some interference from orbs? Possibly, if we take the video as true, but there I’d no chance the plane itself made those maneuvers.

Where is the 37 seconds smoking gun on this timeline?

Edit Oh it’s at 1720.36, 37 seconds before this graph starts. So it gets seen by a low poly uav with a camera mount in its left wing, some guy uses citrix remote desktop with an uncalibrated trackball to view satellite data from the nrol 22 mission, drops in some AE turbulence noise, some inkblot vfx happen, then this radar tracking starts happening.

Did I get that right? Which part is the damning bit?

Altitude and speeds point to unidentified flying objects?

Can you stop using the word «UFOs» like this?

Ok, I don‘t get it.

The plane drops in altitude. Then the UAPs arrive and we have 37 seconds of missing Radar contact. Then MH370 reappears on radar. Did I get the timeline right?

Widebody, longhaul pilot here: no way a B777 could reach FL580…

You see evidence i see bored dude who reads this report and lightbulb poops over his head