Пентагон не может подтвердить или опровергнуть обнаружение материалов, происходящих из нечеловеческого разума или неизвестного происхождения в рамках секретных программ

AARO will never confirm any of this non-terrestrial stuff. Disclosure will never come from this organisation.

>Gough: “To date, AARO has not discovered any verifiable information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist currently.”

Lol ok this quote will go down in history as the most ridiculous propaganda attempt.

>Gough: «there is no restriction to AARO receiving any past or present UAP-related information»

Ok great so you guys have access to all programs even if they’re title 50 and you’re title 10 so you can verify the program names, locations, individuals, documents, photographs submited by Mr Grusch and other firsthand whistleblowers to Congress right??

>Gough: “The issue of potential supplemental statutory authorities for AARO, whether codified in title 10 or title 50 of the United States Code, will be considered as part of its mission requirements. This issue, however, is separate and wholly unrelated to AARO’s unimpeded ability to receive all UAP-related information through authorized disclosures.”

Huh? So why do you need extra authorization if you already have access to all programs?

>Elizondo: ‘The [O]USDI is the one single office that has continuously lied about this topic and persecuted whistleblowers.’

Yup sounds about right.

This continued dancing around the expression «non-human intelligence», referring to «extraterrestrial» instead, along with Grusch’s wording («spacecraft not the right parlance») makes it more and more likely that we are dealing with something other than classical ET.

This is getting more interesting by the day, feels like the DOD is feeling cornered. Susan tried to serve the press some «linguistic spaghetti», to muddy the waters. However, with the answers she gave, she/they only made it more difficult on themselves. They’ve cornered themselves.

* They Keep sticking to Extraterrestrial, while David Grusch has paved the way for Non-Human-Intelligence. When asked about NHI, she couldn’t go any further……LOL
* So when David Grusch stepped forward a few weeks ago, the DOD said they (AARO) had no knowledge of such programs. Now AARO appears to have access to these programs? What happened in the Time between?

The combination of, David Grusch interviews and testimony, involvement of the ICIG, various Congressional and Senate committees must have freaked these fuckers out. Also the possibility of current and former program employees testifying to congress and ICIG, surely is on their minds.

Ross and others have mentioned already many times interviews with these people are going to come out. I think the DOD is trying to prepare for this.

This is starting to feel like «Bagdad Bob» for those who can remember. UAP Bombs are falling all around the DOD, yet the DOD is still pretending there’s nothing to see here. LOL

So they’re literally saying “We might have alien artefacts, but we’re not telling you”

How does the PENTAGON not know and can’t confirm NOR deny anything? These guys are lying their ass off

At the top of point number 4, the clause defining members of AARO as limited access after repeatedly stating that they have full access?? that’s the pure definition of saying «Yes» while shaking your head «No» and winking.

FYI, this is called a [Glomar Response](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_response)

>In United States law, the term Glomar response, also known as Glomarization or Glomar denial,[1] refers to a response to a request for information that will «neither confirm nor deny» (NCND) the existence of the information sought.[2] For example, in response to a request for police reports relating to a certain individual, the police agency may respond with the following: «We can neither confirm nor deny that our agency has any records matching your request.»

>In national or subnational freedom of information policies, governments are often required to tell people who request information (e.g. journalists or attorneys) whether they located the requested records, even if the records end up being kept secret. But at times, a government may determine that the mere act of truthfully disclosing that the records do or do not exist would pose some actual or possible harm, such as to national security, the integrity of an ongoing investigation, or a person’s privacy. For example, disclosing that a police department has documents about a current investigation into a criminal conspiracy, even if the content of the documents is not disclosed, would make it public that the investigation is happening and could help suspects destroy evidence.

>Glomar responses are commonly associated with the United States Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which generally dictates how federal agencies must disclose information. The term «Glomar» originated in association with the FOIA law. Lower courts have thus far ruled the Glomar response to have potential merit if the secretive nature of the material truly requires it, and only if the agency provides «as much information as possible» to justify its claim. Otherwise, the principles established in FOIA may outweigh claims to secrecy.

The word you’re looking for isn’t “unable”…it’s “unwilling”.

What we REALLY need is for the senators interested in this topic to introduce legislation that requires the project and activities of any public corporation that is funded with tax dollars to be subject to FOIA.

I also can’t confirm or deny if I am from a planet named Krypton.

It might make sense why Grusch used the term Non-human Intelligence so much in his interview.

Up until that interview I had never heard the term being used.

They can deny Aliens and Extraterrestrials all day long because it would be true if the reality is these things aren’t technically Alien or Extraterrestrial.

So now instead of asking do you have alien craft or extraterrestrial craft we can start asking do you have non human craft?

Actually a pretty funny delivery of information :

Saying that AARO has not been refused access to any program from past or present US gov. Hmmm … Define program vs project? Is he pruposefully being this obtuse??? Is he saying people part of the AARO do not meet the highest security standards from the start???

Neither confirm nor deny is actually a really good sign. Basically means the answer involves classified material.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_response#:~:text=In%20United%20States%20law%2C%20the,existence%20of%20the%20information%20sought.

Though it’s likely due to an ongoing investigation since congress has said the same thing. That being said, you’d think they’d only want to protect criminal investigations.

Once again, the use of the word «verifiable» comes up. AARO doesn’t yet have the ability to verify any of it. It’s a cop out.

I mean, this is a way of confirming it. If they didn’t have they could just say that they don’t have it..