By admin Май31,2023 #Внеземные существа #Внекосмические существа #Внешний вид пришельцев #Загадки инопланетного воздействия #Загадки инопланетных цивилизаций #Инопланетная жизнь #Инопланетные существа в кино #Инопланетные технологии #ИнопланетныеВоздействия #Инопланетяне #ИнтеракцияСИнопланетянами #Интракосмические существа #Исследование инопланетной жизни #Контакт с инопланетянами #Космические пришельцы #Межзвездные путешествия #Научная фантастика #Популярные о пришельцах #Пришельцы в алфавите #ПришельцыВНауке #ПришельцыИлюди #связанные с пришельцами #Способы общения с пришельцами #Телешоу на инопланетянах #Теории заговоров о пришельцах #Уроки инопланетной истории. 窗体顶端 窗体底端 ЭкспериментыПришельцев #Фантастические инопланетяне #Фильмы о пришельцах #Фэндом пришельцев #Экзобиология #ЭкспериментыНадЛюдьми #Явления 
НЛО сферического типа становятся все более распространенными как среди военных, так и среди гражданских. Пентагон говорит, что это «не инопланетяне», но не комментирует, кто они.
Почему люди всегда предполагают, что пришельцы находятся здесь по «служебным делам»?
Correction: The Pentagon never said it was «not aliens,» Kirkpatrick said «no evidence its extraterrestrial,» and obviously they’re still open to the fact it could be since it was Kirkpatrick who wrote the [paper](https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~loeb/LK1.pdf) with Avi Loeb the same month stating it could be aliens.
The dumb journalists misinterpreted «no evidence» as «not aliens» and put that in the headlines. This writer Tara Copp working for AP I’m assuming was the first to do that and then these other journalists just read her article and copied that wording or made the same dumb misinterpretation.
The headline title reads «not aliens» yet she says in the article itself:
>»While there’s **no evidence** of extraterrestrials, they still pose a threat, the government said in a declassified report summary released Thursday.»
https://apnews.com/article/politics-nuclear-weapons-1100eb5ee11ea739d124ae49ca36b00d
Not aliens but will not comment on what they are. Genius logic!
«Not aliens» suggests they know what they are yes, but the quote is «said there is no evidence of aliens.» Which is very different.
You been clickbaited my friend.
The FLIR video is allegedly a video of the Tic Tac UFO Cmdr. Fravor saw, and was recorded by a fellow pilot who flew out to find it after his team returned. Fravor said it was shaped like a tictac, not an orb
I actually took a picture in Scotland about ten years ago and captured one of these orb ufos in it. I’ve never shared it publicly but if anyone’s interested I could try and dig it out hopefully I’ve still got it. Creeped me out at the time as where we were is just a small island off the west coast with nothing surrounding and even my family found it strange and they don’t care for this sort of thing at all
They never said its not Aliens, they said they didn’t know. Theres a difference.
Did they say “not aliens” or something like Kirkpatrick said? ie — there is no proof they are aliens. Their wording is often very specific and misleading. They will often make comments about a very specific number of cases not in regard to the phenomenon as a whole.
Interesting logic, since the law of the excluded middle does not apply here!
The Pentagon says that it is not aliens: they mean, *we cannot say that the observations concern aliens*. There is no proof that it concerns aliens.
But the Pentagon also implicitly means, *we cannot say that the observations* ***do not*** *concern aliens*. Proving a negative is often difficult.
So both mutually contradicting statements are unproven. Note that Scottish Law knows the verdict unproven.
The Pentagon should be asked to clarify its logic.
If the Pentagon with all its resources has been unable for such a long time to solve this mystery of the orbs is it not time to organize, just as was done in the 17th and 18th centuries in countries such as France and the UK, a scientific contest for physicists and engineers to give the best explanation for what is going here and what clearly constitutes a significant threat to the security of the US and allied nations?
Listen to the Astonishing Legends podcast, they did 4 part miniseries with a member of the family that witnessed it and lived through everything in real time. It’s like 12 hours but they’re super fascinating.
Hynek was at the Betz house acting shady and secretly examining it.
The Debrief podcast has Crissy Newton interviewing Paul Hynek. Its either in that interview or another where he mentions having one at home when he grew up.
The Astonishing Legends podcast has info where a scientist stated it had 3 magnetic poles but one of the cells looked exploded or damaged so it could only roll around and not fly.
It’s alien probes. I mean, they have been around in WW2 (foo fighters), so I’m pretty sure it can’t be «Made in the USA».
Sightings are becoming more because something is brewing.
They always say there there is «no evidence of aliens» but there is also «no evidence of humans»
these aren’t orange orbs tho are they?
When did the Pentagon say that? Source?
if you really want to know what these things are read some books by legit researchers. don’t watch youtube videos or read some sites — they’re all about generating traffic and revenue , I strongly recommend Jacque Vallee’s «Passport to Magonia» and Mac Tonnie’s «Cryptoterrestrials» if you want to understand why those things are not extraterrestrial
Well its a silver ball that zips around.
Someone made it
cool compilation photo. saved it to my wallpaper folder
I was close with my ex’s grandfather. Haven’t been in touch for a decade so I assume he’s since passed. He was a pilot in the navy in the 1960’s. I don’t remember what he flew only that he said it was the fastest aircraft the navy had and that he had fly by wire missiles he could guide while flying.
Said once he was flying he described something just like one of those foo fighters. A kind of ball of light about the size of a car flew up paralell to him. I don’t remember if he mentioned pulling it up on radar or if anything went screwy with instruments. But I do remember he said he was within visual range, it was close. And when he attempted to get a closer look it took off at speed. He went as fast as his craft would go and couldn’t keep up and broke pursuit to refuel.
He was aparently describing the object while on the radio. When he landed he was asked to give a full report then dismissed. Said he never found out what it was. Didn’t know if it was ours and couldn’t begin to speculate.
My father mentioned to me once a friend of his that was a commercial pilot for his career said he saw similar once.
I’m going to advocate for reverse engineered Betz sphere traveling on magnetic currents. USG knows it’s not alien but original device was. Stolen by Hynek and reproduced. His son confirmed they had a metallic sphere at home in a podcast.
I believe these are an advanced type of drone. No evidence but to me it is the simplest explanation.
They’re not aliens if they’ve been here all along
The Mosul orb is one of the craziest ones. Clear as day. Obviously moving faster than the wind. Even being a short video, it’s insane to see.
And secondly the splash ufo. I keep seeing people say its a balloon. But last I checked, balloons can’t forcefully submerge and make a splash.
Was the FLIR UFO really an orb? It didn’t look spherical.
Fascinating how «no evidence it’s aliens» was transformed by yahoo news headline writers to «it’s NOT aliens» which is then evhoed by reddit crowd.
«No evidence of» != «it’s defined not»
how much of these are from reputable sources? where the source is the official organization and the still/video has been officially released, claimed as theirs.