Дистанционный наблюдатель Дик Оллгайр объясняет, что он увидел, когда проводил сеанс на колесах, посвященный «происхождению» разбившегося Розуэллского UAP: «Лучший способ, который я могу придумать, чтобы объяснить это, — это 3D-нанотехнологическая печать металла с помощью нейронных сетей. .»

should ask him to view 2027-2029 and see what kind of stuff he comes up with.

Submission Statement:

Remote Viewer Dick Allgire, with the Farsight Institute in 2017, describes what he saw when he did a remote viewing session of where the Roswell UAP came from, or it’s ‘origin’.

He describes that he saw an incredibly complicated but sophisticated technology that essentially 3D prints a UAP to specification based on its purpose at the nanoscopic levels. Further more, there is a ‘neural network’ encoded into these UAPs, suggesting some biological element.

I found this interesting because of the infamous 4chan post that made the rounds a few months ago that talked about similar things on how UAPs are built. An anecdotal connection.

[Video Source (Warning: Paywall)](https://www.farsightprime.com/roswell-crash-at-corona/videos/roswell-crash-at-corona-farsight)

Wow, chuck a Turbo Encabulator on there an then we’re really cooking with gas 😱🙄

ive always thought of this like mycelium from a mushroom

Not for nothing but many people who’ve claimed to have been in or have seen UAPs have described it in this exact way a biological alloy that was either wax molded or in modern day 3d printed

Seems legit

I bet he doesn’t get to pick what he remote views either, does he?


Ok who gave grandpa a webcam and access to the internet?

Lol what a bunch of word soup, just daisy chaining buzz words together 😂

Is this the same concept of neural networks of machine learning?

If what he saw wasn’t all tech startup buzzwords it might have been belieavable.

The white board just makes it so much more legit to me.

Some of you folks will believe or at least pretend to believe anything. It’s baffling really.

I’m looking at the rules on the right column.In what sense is this quality content? Or substantive? If some guy tells that he can «see» that somehow and then I’m expected to believe this, then in what way is this **not** a religious matter? And don’t give me that «yeah well you can take this however you like». If it would come to that then hey, someone could as well just video themselves of getting an esoteric connection to the alien phone lines by dabbling a pile of dog doodoo with their hands. «Well, man, take it how you like 🤷 I ain’t saying it’s a proof but…»

You guys do understand that for some, these buzzwords aren’t peculiar sci-fiesque search terms for youtube, but actual things our careers are about? If you’re about to incorporate the use of those terms in your material or content, at least learn about them, at least a spoonful more than what a typical hollywood-tier netflix documentary explains

Remote viewers: the ultimate trust me bros

I feel like I’m remote viewing the public access tv studio in the Villages.

So some guy says he has magical powers and pulls some stuff about aliens out of his ass and this is in any way interesting or convincing to some people?

Why?

I cannot remember where I heard or read it, but the info was “our craft are not built, they are grown.”

This deeply jives with that.

Ive seen a lot of low quality garbage posts on this subreddit. It’s to be expected, it’s par for the course with this topic. Idiots come out of the woodwork spouting all kinda of nonsensical garbage. For example, a remote viewing (lol) person said a bunch of technical terms in a garbled volley of gibberish. Mods, why are you allowing shit like this? It detracts from genuine discussion of real events.

If love to know what he means by neural networks. How is that specifically visually represented?

Thanks for sharing