Отличное интервью, каждый раз, когда я здесь говорю о Джеймсе, мне нравится его взгляд больше, скептик, который рассказывает хорошую историю, основанную на фактах и свидетельствах из первых рук. Как и в случае с Россом Култхартом, было бы интересно собрать их вместе в подкасте.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRDW2iDx8q0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRDW2iDx8q0)
Похожие записи:
Просочившийся документ, полностью подтверждающий историю Боба Лазара, это все меняет… Мой объяснитель анимации
Как люди могут не верить?
Эп. 6 — Гипноз Барни Хилла и связь MK-Ultra
Эта маленькая ухмылка в конце…
Необработанные кадры НЛО, которые видели я и мой друг (NSFW для языка)
Правительство скрывает инопланетян
АКТИВНЫЕ НЕБЕСНЫЕ АНОМАЛИИ — Созвездие Кассиопеи ок. 1:40–1:55 утра по тихоокеанскому времени каждую ночь в течение последних дней, как долго
Нашу Историю пора ПЕРЕПИСАТЬ. Эти находки археологов Наука не в Силах объяснить
10 мест с привидениями в Брэдфорде
Факты об образовании Боба Лазара против вымысла (на основе новых подлинных документов) и почему мы должны отдавать предпочтение первоисточникам при расследовании чьего-либо происхождения и образования
Funny, the more he talks, the more skeptical I become. Liked him better as a silent documentarian.
Some pretty harsh negative comments on here today. Well I think he’s doing something good which is better than nothing which is what most people including myself are doing. I’m rooting for him to keep at it.
[deleted]
Hate to say that’s it’s still all hot air until someone offers something solid. Talk is cheap.
This dude is the furthest thing away from a skeptic, he would buy a bridge in Brooklyn if you asked him to
Fox is doing amazing work. Boots on the ground investigation, interviewing eyewitnesses, and presenting things credibly. This subject needs more people like him.
Dude m honestly sick of hearing about this shit. James fox needs to put up or shut the fuck ip
The two things that really tip me off that James Fox is grifting is:
1. He repeats his stories on every podcast nearly verbatim. He will describe stories in nearly the exact same way, using the same language down to analogies, same gestures, intonation, etc. It sounds like he’s reading off a script in his head so he can keep his story straight. Just look at how he describes the Chuck Charles video on each podcast (Joe Rogan, Logan Paul, etc) and he will describe it the same way with about 90% accuracy.
2. The two things that really tipped me off that James Fox is grifting is: he tends to divert away from serious questions by switching the subject to a point he wants to highlight. He ends up never returning to the original question, diverting it completely. He’ll only answer the questions he wants to answer.
I really **want** to believe him, but damn my bullshit sensors are going off the more I listen to him.
Ross Coulthart isn’t a skeptic. He’s a fully paid-up member of the Believers Club. I’m not sure Fox is a skeptic either, is he? But then I’ve not listened to him as much as I have Coulthart.
ETA: exactly which part of my comment have people taken exception to? The fact that Coulthart isn’t a skeptic?