Почему мы доверяем науке
Похожие записи:
Судебные документы США утверждают, что «картель» Синалоа находится под защитой правительства США. (ТНЭ, 2011 г.)
Наука и НЛО — Красная панда-коала (Всестороннее исследование НЛО и науки с 1966 года) Эту информацию невозможно забыть…
«Вы хотите знать, когда инопланетяне прибудут на Землю?» Директор НАСА о феномене
Что Вы думаете об этом?
Обе стороны имеют тиранию.
В 1953 году Командование ПВО США отследило UAP в ограниченном воздушном пространстве над Верхним озером. Northrop F-89C Scorpion был поднят на перехват UAP. F-89 просто исчез с радаров после столкновения с UAP и больше не вернулся. Ни обломков, ни останков пилотов не было найдено.
Новые результаты исследования NIH проливают свет на то, почему у Jabbed развивается непрерывный кашель и привычка плеваться
Помните, как парень с 4chan сказал следить за прорывами в лазерных технологиях?
Умирает больше молодых американцев — и это не COVID. Почему мы не ищем ответы?
Подтвержденное ВМС Чили видео, на котором НЛО выбрасывает неизвестное вещество.
The greatest issue with science is the requirement of funding, which taints everything with corrupted intent. 90% of studies cannot be repeated for a reason. Much of our modern science is total hogwash that works just enough to get by.
Our mathematics, physics and other sciences are an art form that truly exist and help explain the world, but only in a single, pale picture in a multi colored complex world. They cannot explain everything, nor even a fraction. We must invent new arts of understanding to bridge the gap of knowledge on UAP and this multi dimensional stuff.
Science is not religion though.Also, dismissing anything and everything as fake because we can’t make sense of it is lazy.
The scientific method should be applied everywhere and if there is lack of data due to over-classification then it should be made available to the community no matter what the cost be to the authorities.
I am a believer and I completely believe all evidence and sightings can be scientifically explained.
It is just our hubris thinks the humans know all the science there is to know.
I’ve never heard that take on burning or destroying knowledge we have on science. Until today. That was fucking great.
Wouldn’t most civilizations come to an idea of religion at some point. The idea of a creator/ creators, the idea of a soul and life after death?
There is no settled science. It is constantly evolving with the times. What I learned as science as a child, much of it has changed. Pluto is not a planet, brontosaurus is not a dinosaur, the universe is at least twice as old as we believed, and on and on. When someone tells you trust the science it’s like saying trust the government. It’s always a bad idea. Know the science , all of it, not just the talking points or only the good points. Next, make up your own mind because in a few years, the advice of the experts will be null and void frequently.
Not seeing the relevance to this sub. OP… Comment?
The problem with science specifically astronomers, and astrophysics, is although they freely admit they don’t have a lot of the information . They make up theories of space , planet formation star formation , etc anyway,
they invented this catch all term “ dark matter”
What is dark matter made of ? “ unknown subatomic particles.”
They don’t know , what they are even talking about when they say dark matter .
It’s a theory within a theory, used to prove theories
Why can’t they just say here’s our best guess , but we really don’t know ?
Because, has anyone ever met, or have even been aware of a professional space scientist , who does not have a huge ego ? And think they are a genius?
And who would buy their books and fund their research grants if they told the truth?
That’s it’s all an educated guess .
Well I like to bet pro football games occasionally, and that’s all an educated guess too .
Imaging how advanced, healthy and balanced ALL of humanity would be if we funded Science, like we now with War, terror, spying, corporate greed.
We can do better.
If by man made Law and Religon we are all equal, why are we not???
Colbert had to tip his cap in defeat
Love his shows, but wouldn’t trust Ricky since he’s just like Mick West.
There is nothing wrong in finding value in science, but both Gervais and Dawkins suffer from the position that it is the end-all without seeing the limitations. Dawkins is also guilty of holding a stupid belief that intellect necessitates atheism.
The biggest problem with scientific dogma is that if you can’t measure it, it doesn’t exist.
Its hard to use the scientific method when data and experiments keep being concealed from you. When the existing proof is ignored. When disinformation campaigns force us to adopt a more skeptical approach into studying this phoenomena, and as such make us wrongly dismiss other possible truthful evidence as hoaxes. When the conclusions you draw from what you have and from similar events keep getting dismissed, keep getting ignored. When for most of the world, this topic is still regarded as ridiculous and for the loony.
It’s important to note: We don’t prove science. We fail to disprove it. The distinction is important. It means that, even though we may retest something multiple times with the same results, there can always be the potential for different outcomes. This is essentially what disprovability is. If a hypothesis can’t potentially be disproven, then it becomes pseudoscience.
Science is great. It bases itself on fact and statistics. But if our limited minds can’t understand how to study a topic, it doesn’t mean it can’t exist. That is incredible human arrogance to think we are so smart, that we know all.
Reddit memindme! In 250 years… is that ya do it?
They are arresting environmental scientists around the world, I wonder whose in charge
This is why I hate content with «scientists don’t want you to know» or «science can’t explain». «They don’t want you to know». First symptoms of terminal internet brain rot is watching anything that spams science wants to lie to you. Lazy shit like this brought back flat earthers I’m my lifetime.
I don’t think we can talk about trust in science. Science is experiments, tests and proofs. You can only believe in things that cannot be proven. You cannot say that you believe that the water molecule consists of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen. You can check by looking through a microscope and then you’ll know it’s true. In addition, today science is still the only reliable tool for understanding reality.
I don’t trust science, I trust what I can see and feel.
Science is a controlled narrative. The studies are chosen and paid for by the highest bidders. The sponsors decide what gets put into text books.
Maybe if you burned those holy books, in 1000 years you might end up with an almost exact replication of those events in a slightly new way. It appears our religions were never fairy tales and illusions of understanding, but a true and detailed text book trying to prepare us for a recurring trial that happens to humanity ever millenia or so.
https://vocal.media/futurism/face-the-martian-arti-facts
We need more Nasa whistleblowers to help Force disclosure
I’d compare religion to history with an asterisk on it since religion isn’t science but moreso an attempt to explain why we’re here. By that token if we destroyed all history we wouldn’t know what took place before and that would also be lost in the same way Gervais said religion would be lost. Just an apples to orange comparison I saw in Gervais’s example.
Science is great but I still hate Ricky Gervais
«What if we learn that everything, even the nature of the universe and reality itself is constantly changing? If the only constant is change, why should we assume that science is any different?»
-Ernus P. Scrota
In my mind science has a lot more in common with scientology, than the mythology it has created about itself.
Try the book, ‘The New Inquisition’ by Robert Anton Wilson. It’s not a new book though it really doesn’t matter as science has only gotten worse since it was written.
I can’t believe they cut the video 3 seconds early. Outrageous.
Not sure i agree that religious texts wouldn’t come back, there seem to be an awful lot of similarities between them.
Bitches
He’s wrong though, almost all of what’s considered science today is completely contradictory to what it was in Ancient Egypt. Everything comes from the unseen to the seen , nothings solid Its all an illusion. Human consciousness isn’t even understood, people have to understand that this material science isn’t gonna solve this problem. The scientific community is funded by the very ones covering this up. McDonnell Douglas CEO told you that the scientific community is kept in the dark in regards to the discoveries made within the secret UAP program.
West/Modern science is inadequate to say the least. There can’t be progress Until we begin to take the nonphysical into account. Nature is technology, Francis Bacon said the goal is to dominate nature, but nature isn’t to be dominated.
My favourite thing about science is it doesn’t need these pompous jackasses to defend it