Превосходная критика парадокса Ферми

Fermi Paradox is overrated imho. It’s a nice thought experiment that provides food for thought and gets people questioning things, but at no point was it supposed to be seen as some sort of observational truth that is set in stone.

In a similar vein, people revere the Great Filter hypothesis, which is just another notion trying to understand the lack of observable evidence — but people take it way too seriously.

It has reached a point where it seems to lead to narrow minded discourse that isn’t even considering the scientific reality.

This interview was certainly refreshing in that regard.

No, they are just not up to date yet, since they still aren’t aware that I solved the paradox about a year ago, which is what David Kipping (just one of several people I contacted since then) likely meant in his recent video that initially was titled «We solved the Fermi paradox».

The reason for why alien civilizations hide from each other is that otherwise, if they were to allow themselves to be seen in this extremely see-through universe, they would just by virtue of the mass-psychological consequences unfolding upon the fact of such observation risk misguiding pre-mature civilizations like ours towards becoming more active in deep space, increasing the risk that forward contamination of resilient, far-evolved microbes to previously pristine, sterile celestial bodies occurs, which in turn can kick-start wildly out of control evolution of life and consequently were to dominantly cause astronomically gargantuan extents of pain and suffering to the octillions of wildlife animals arising in such evolution of life process, which advanced, mature civilizations would by virtue of the utilitarian universal empathy principle know to want to avert nearly at all costs.

And so consequently, the steady-state solution of the Fermi paradox consists of naturally emerging civilizations that just stay on their home-world, hide, and by their location of emergence are assigned a region of space around them in which they can exercise local cosmic intervention operations for the macro-ethical good, until a galaxy is covered by regions of civilizations’ local influences, similar to a mathematical minimal packing problem, but for covering a galaxy with the least required amount of civilizations in order to keep as much of it overall as sterile as possible for as long as possible. And for the case of a spiral galaxy, chances are that the majority — if not all — of such civilizations will inhabit star systems moving together with the main-stream of stars around the galactic center, since for wrong-way-driver star systems, due to their severely increased interaction rates with different galaxy regions, both the emergence of a civilization as well as their continued long-term presence is at far higher risk. The only exception to this general behavior might arise near the very end of the universe’s development when galaxies have ran out of material with which to keep stars burning, darkened severely with «the lights having gone out», and planets have cooled out sufficiently far, so that the risk of accidental or intentional, direct or indirect causation by civilizations of lasting, uncontrolled evolutions of wildlife has upon astronomically slow, gradual decay finally diminished to a sufficiently low level as to potentially conceivably provide macro-ethical allowance or even justification for civilizations to not have to hide and be silent anymore.

For the more elaborate explanation, look it up here:

[https://www.reddit.com/r/Efilism/comments/111n2l2/all_or_nothing_ethics_on_cosmic_scale_outer_space/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Efilism/comments/111n2l2/all_or_nothing_ethics_on_cosmic_scale_outer_space/)

​

Also, Jill Tarters’ false analogy that often comes up doesn’t accurately describe the situation we face in regards to the question about aliens sending any messages to us (which if they anyway intended for it to do anything, to have any effect on at least someone’s psychology and their reaction behavior, for which it requires to be at the very least noticed to be unnatural, outstandingly unusual, if not even intentionally designed to be as simple to understand as possible, which certainly would be very easy to do, then I can assert to you that they would not have failed in this step part of any messaging plan), since it’s far from taking a tea spoon of water from the ocean and then claiming there is no whales in the ocean, but much rather the taking of a tiny fraction of water out of every cubic meter volume of water of the entire ocean, then seeing that there is nothing but water in there, and then concluding that there is no whales in the ocean as then there would have been a part of a whale among the samples. At the very most it could be messages of a kind that’d be meant to underlay certain restrictions for identification of them as messages, with all subsumed alien messages sent to us underlying such conditions.