Рептильные гуманоиды?!

От admin #Внеземные существа, #Внекосмические существа, #Внешний вид пришельцев, #Загадки инопланетного воздействия, #Загадки инопланетных цивилизаций, #Инопланетная жизнь, #Инопланетные существа в кино, #Инопланетные технологии, #ИнопланетныеВоздействия, #Инопланетяне, #ИнтеракцияСИнопланетянами, #Интракосмические существа, #Исследование инопланетной жизни, #Контакт с инопланетянами, #Космические пришельцы, #Межзвездные путешествия, #Научная фантастика, #Популярные о пришельцах, #Пришельцы в алфавите, #ПришельцыВНауке, #ПришельцыИлюди, #связанные с пришельцами, #Способы общения с пришельцами, #Телешоу на инопланетянах, #Теории заговоров о пришельцах, #Уроки инопланетной истории. 窗体顶端 窗体底端 ЭкспериментыПришельцев, #Фантастические инопланетяне, #Фильмы о пришельцах, #Фэндом пришельцев, #Экзобиология, #ЭкспериментыНадЛюдьми, #Явления


[zengrid id=»https://dzen.ru/xfiles1″ text=»true» textlen=»30″ count=»1″ col=»1″]

Весной 2017 года исследователи начали научное расследование происхождения шести трехпалых мумий, найденных в Наска (Перу). Предварительные результаты анализов аномальных рук самой крупной мумии, проведенных в сравнении с остальными частями тела, не выявили никаких признаков, указывающих на мистификацию. Ученые установили, что самая крупная мумия, Мария, была женской, и определили ее возраст по углеродному датированию — примерно 1700 лет. Началась кропотливая работа по включению ДНК мумий в летопись окаменелостей, сравнение их с ДНК современных и древних людей. С каждой находкой возникает все больше вопросов, поэтому последние новости можно найти здесь.

От admin

25 комментарий для “Рептильные гуманоиды?!”
  1. Alright here we go Spanish speaker here based on what I got from watching the whole video there was 2 specimens presented, the first specimen appeared to be that of a “normal” human being besides the fact that theres a 16% in crease in skull size and from what they explained specimen #1 appeared to have been mutilated by having their thumb and what appears to be pinky finger removed, as they can see the mutilation marks and bone structure damage, they explain they believe it was done for ritualistic purposes, now the second specimen aka “Maria” is where things get interested from what they said “Maria” aka specimen #2 also had a 16% increased skull but the more fascinating detail is when observing her hands there are NO signs of mutilation she naturally had 3 fingers based on the bone structure they also go on to explain the reason they named it Maria and know it was of female sex is because she basically still had breasts.
    Note* they also stated the cause of death for the 1st one might have been “obliteration” don’t really get that part, also the fact the first one appeared to be human but had a 16% increased skull leads me to personally think maybe specimen #1 was a hybrid of sorts ? and was mutilated to appear more like the “other” beings ? Idk just throwing it out there

  2. Not going to claim to be an expert after 10 minutes of reading their site and doing some google searches, but there are articles pointing to this being a kind of archeological fraud.

  3. Woah, I just read about this in a book I’m reading:

    «During the course of the Earth’s history, there have been many different species who have lived here. You have convinced yourself that humanity is native to this planet. Human beings were put here. People are in for a shock because they are going to discover very shortly the skeletal forms of very different creatures. Some of these have already been discovered, particularly in South America, though they have been either written up in your tabloid newspapers and passed off as a hoax or fearfully kept in secret.»

    From ‘Bringers of the Dawn: Teachings from the Pleiadians’ published in 1992.

    Groovy synchronicity, man ✌

  4. Strange. I’ve heard plenty of unreliable info about this subject but have always rejected it as fringe conspiracy.

    The linked website itself isn’t necessarily reliable, but it presents enough material that this deserves consideration.

    This appears to be primarily from 2018 with a lot of digital material. I currently have not looked into the material presented. The videos appear to be real. The images look great, but could feasibly be faked. The documents require additional review.

    Idk, this kind of thinking is traditionally «crazy» but as more information comes to light, there is a lot of content about this subject.

  5. Here are the scientists names, in order of presentation and their affiliations.

    1. Raymundo Salas Alfaro
    Radiologist – Cusco – Peru

    2. José de la Cruz Ríos López
    Biologist – Campeche – Mexico

    3. José de Jesús Zalce Benítez
    Forensic Doctor – Mexico – Mexico

    4. Galetskiy Dmitriy Vladislàvovich
    Medicine’s University of St. Petersburg – Russia

    5. Salvador Angel Romero (Abraxas)
    Graduate in Genomics by the UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico)

    I’m doing this because a lot of popular comments are falsely stating they can’t find the “congressmen” or relying on IMDb data (lol).

    No congressmen presented anything, nor should they have, it’s a scientific presentation made by scientists to Congress.

    Shills man…

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *