Как это влияет на их авторитет? Или вообще?
Похожие записи:
Спорные смерти исследователей НЛО, журналистов и авторов. (лекция Питера Роббинса)
В свете недавних заявлений Дэвида Груша, возможно, пришло время еще раз взглянуть на звонящего из Зоны 51 от побережья до побережья. (Начало с 1:33) Также обратите внимание, что в последние годы становится все труднее найти это видео на YouTube.
Fin365 — Black Diamond НЛО преследует озеро Онтарио — 2001 — компьютерная реконструкция
Тайны и споры об НЛО: специальный репортаж на NewsNation
Кто-нибудь может поговорить с Хаимом Эшедом?
Так считаются ли иглу и гамбургеры одной и той же формой? Нам нужно начать копаться в старых книгах об НЛО
50к за мусорное ведро
Само влияние заявления Груша о том, что правительство сдерживает технологию чистой энергии, ошеломляет.
Я попытался выяснить, говорит ли Дэвид Груш правду, перевернув звук из его интервью NewsNation.
Синтез, отдача, открытие: обнаружен новый тип атомного ядра
Took a simple fact check to find out that this person has no source of this information. No corroboration to this claim as well from anyone.
Edit — I am seeing the OP claiming they have a source of this information that they cannot share.
That seems kinda sketchy. Like, why wouldn’t they be under oath? What’s the point of even doing this if they are not under oath?
There is no source for this. Check [this comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/155soox/comment/jsvwse2/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) in r/UFOs
So the same voices we’ve all heard before, still with no need to tell the truth?
This is rapidly turning into an episode of Ancient Aliens.
Are you Patrick from the show?
Is this really confirmed?
Lame
I been always interested in this topic. Listened to podcasts, documentaries ect. This all seem sketch. I’m losing faith more and more in the topic and even if its at all real. Nobody in the public seems to care, the military industrial complex unfortunately is too strong. We let it happen and they’re well prepared for this. I doubt we hear or get anything and wouldn’t doubt this is where it all ends. If they mess up this hearing its all over.
There’s no evidence of the tweet existing on the account that tweeted it, ergo It was deleted due to fabrication.
[this is the only remaining evidence, a single reply with no source](https://imgur.com/a/LKXdshd)
Look at OP’s profile guys, he has direct links to the podcast account that the tweet is from. I think there’s some misinfo for exposure going on.
This is not a criminal hearing so no oath will be administered. These so called whistleblowers will speak and tell their tales. They’ll refer to some sketchy reports and hearsay and be blown out of the water by a very simple question “where is your proof?”. Bob Lazar has bailed, NASA has done a reversal, this is going to disappoint a lot of believers. The only disclosure that will be made is the simple fact that NO ONE has one shred of proof. Pictures of a shiny dot in the sky are not proof. Alien abduction reports are not proof. He said she said is not proof. There is a big difference between claiming to have seen something and sitting in front of a hearing and telling about it. I know. I’ve been there. Not about UAPs but I was a witness in a hearing about another matter.
[deleted]
So they bullied people to not testify and now we learn that whoever is testifying doesnt have to tell the truth? Im ready for a big nothing burger now. Seems more and more like its going to just be the same stuff everyone in the UFO community has been talking about for decades, only now its going to be talked about in congress.
Cant wait for our military budget to skyrocket after this. More and more it seems to me that this is what its all about. We are going to have WW3, this is almost certain at this point, every country in Europe is preparing, and the best way to ask for a ton of money for military without outright saying its for WW3 is to make it about aliens, to a soft disclosure, say one or two things to terrify people, then rake in trillions. Hopefully this theory is completely wrong.
Well, this is getting worse.
Does being under oath actually mean anything though?
Not true. Elizondo said this guys claims is false