Утверждается: бывший генеральный инспектор Разведывательного сообщества США «покидает их юридическую фирму» и теперь представляет г-на Груша лично.
*IMPORTANT*
If, as Knapp and Corbell (per Grusch) claim, the former inspector general of the U.S. Intelligence Community is "leaving their law firm" and is now representing Mr. Grusch personally, this is a *stunning* development. pic.twitter.com/b2rXhJ5nUp
— MarikvR (@MvonRen) June 13, 2023
Just confirming what Ross Coulthart said when discussing with Mick West on the post Grusch-interview analysis on NewsNation on Sunday evening.
Coulthart almost explicitly said this while alluding to the fact, and I have to say — the man delivers again.
As per the Twitter headline of MvonRen (Fmr federal gov’t (DoD, et al.)): If, as Knapp and Corbell (per Grusch) claim, the former inspector general of the U.S. Intelligence Community is «leaving their law firm» and is now representing Mr. Grusch personally.
*What struck with me:*
The law firm represents whistleblowers and active-duty government employees. As Dave is no longer a govt employee, they cannot proceed with his case, this by no means represents a lack of belief or trust in Dave’s claims, it just means as a firm they cannot engage with him directly. However seeing the lawyer that has represented him all the way through, willing to leave his firm to represent him independently to continue engagement with him I find compelling and huge; shows his dedication to the ICIG complaint and the truth.
He has a name if you care to look it up: Charles McCullough. Former Intelligence Community Inspector General 2010 — 2017.
Incidentally the very first ICIG. The position was created in 2010.
Protect these people for humanity’s sake
According to the Weaponized podcast, the law firm that represented Grusch up to now only represents current government employees. Since Grusch exited the government in April, this law firm can no longer represent him.
The former inspector general, formerly of that law firm, is “peeling off” to continue representing Grusch.
That’s quite the fkn chess move. I would love to see that live.
In this episode, they describe how this interview and article was the Plan B, because his name got leaked.
Dave never wanted to go public.
Also from my perspective, that Inspector left his law firm to represent Dave means a lot.
Thanks for posting! I messaged the mods with a link to this earlier to add to the mega thread.
Corbell and Knapp’s sources/reporting, as crazy as it seems at times, keeps panning out so I have been listening to them more.
This is big in the sense that having the original ICIG personally representing Grusch is pretty compelling considering the upcoming hearing.
I have acknowledged Grusch’s credentials and respect his service but I have said «Show us» for sure. One thing that has bothered me is how people around here have gone after him for his demeanor in the interview, that dumb assed «body language» lady someone linked from YT etc.
He seemed to have a nervous excitement, like if I was asked how did he seem talking to Ross, I would use either/both to describe him.
With this development, if he absolutely knew he had the goods, knew he was about to go down forever in the history books as the man who exposed it all, well, I think a lot of us would have the demeanor he displayed. This newest news, assuming its correct and I will for the moment, gives a lot of weight of my initial assessment at least to myself.
Im curious to see how all those that jumped on the law firm concluding business with Grusch process this new information.
Holy. Shit.
I don’t think many have really grasped how big this is.
Firstly, if the lawyer did not think that Grusch’s claims were well founded, there’s no way he would have signed onto the complaint in the first place. Doing something like that can and will get you professionally censured, and even disbarred as a lawyer.
For example, if you in your professional capacity advise your client to sign a document under penalty of perjury, that he knows, and can provide proof about the secret lizard people on the sun, unless you have really good reason to think that’s true, your certification to practice law, and therefore your livelihood, are liable to go away.
But now, not only did this former IG sign on to the complaint, but is splitting off from the firm in order to represent Grusch. That is big. Grusch does not strike me as a particularly wealthy man, and lawyers like him are not typically cheap. Something else is motivating his continued persistence is providing representation.
I thought that this is what we’re going to find out. Hahaha can’t wait for Mick’s thoughts
Every Single True American Should Help Protect Mr. GRUSCH.
Wow. Now this is fascinating. The story becomes more credible by the day. And the reporter was right. He also said current employees that are physically working with the crafts will also come forward officially.
Exciting times.
The firm would likely just re hire him when the case is closed I assume. Seems they are all behind him 🙂
Mick is entitled to be skeptical but he is so entrenched that he fails to keep an open mind. I don’t believe in god but would class myself as agnostic because I don’t know for certain, it would be arrogant to presume otherwise.
how do we donate to his legal defense?
Its kind of funny because if they charge him for exposing classified information than they are acknoledging that it is true
When ever I see Corbells face all I can think of is a leprechaun and elf mixed together. He’s such a bumbling idiot
Now we sit back and wait for Steven Greenstreet’s retraction… (cricket chirp)…(cricket chirp)… (cricket chirp)…
Its coming out folks. Even the skeptics are starting to turn their heads. This isnt going to stop. I think the next 5-7 years are going to be the most revealing in all of recorded history. Basically the book of Revalations coming to pass.
The firm could hire him back when he is done representing Grusch. It’s just paperwork.
This is incredibly encouraging and makes some of Ross Coulthart’s recent comments on this matter more sensible.
Well, I’m inclined to believe David Grusch. Let’s have some truth & science here.
Will there be a lawsuit?