Бендер о Груше: «Насколько я могу судить из нескольких авторитетных источников, причастных к этому делу осведомителя, ни одно из этих утверждений не было подкреплено доказательствами… люди, которые видели секретную информацию, согласны с тем, что он делает предположения и относительно знаний из вторых рук, а не прямых доказательств».
As far as I can tell from several well-placed sources involved in this whistleblower case, none of these claims have been backed up by evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. https://t.co/K01lkg2lza
— Bryan Bender (@BryanDBender) June 13, 2023
Похожие записи:
Кадры из Лас-Ломаса, вероятно, лучшее видео, доступное в Интернете. Несколько ученых и специалистов по компьютерной графике проверяют подлинность видео.
«Город астероидов» Уэса Андерсона.
Эйнштейн видел НЛО в Розуэлле, сказал его помощник на протяжении всей жизни в интервью 1993 года.
Огни над Лиссабоном — продолжение
Онтологический шок, когнитивный диссонанс и пещера Платона
Пропавшее время, за которым следуют повторяющиеся сны о том, как моя машина падает со мной внутри, и отчет Престона Деннета о «Случаях с НЛО для подъема автомобилей». Джозеф Беркс, доктор медицины, 2022 г.
AARO получила свидетельство об обнаружении крушения НЛО
Бодминская тюрьма Викторина
НЛО/УАП Аризона. Сначала оригинальный скриншот. Второй увеличенный скриншот. В-третьих, оригинальное видео. Четвертое — замедленное и увеличенное видео.
Эпизод Art Bell 4-25-2001 с документальным фильмом Deek Richards / Varginha.
His tweet is deleted.
He deleted the tweet LOL
So he’s using 2nd and 3rd hand sources to tell him if another person used 2nd and 3rd hand sources. Grusch specifically said he was briefed by people in the programs, provided documents, pictures, names and locations of the programs. That’s evidence.
Says the dude quoting anonymous sources. You can’t bitch about Grusch supposedly using them then immediately turn around and do the same thing.
Who is Bryan Bender?
Let me get this straight…Bender says Grusch’s claims are not backed up by evidence… and he backs that up by citing anonymous sources?
can’t wait for the unknown guys that showed the DVD,to come out!
Was he able to relay one or more program code words, yes or no.
How about names and locations associated with the work, yes or no.
If the answer is yes, it provides the ICIG’s office, as well as Congress, a significant set of threads to pull at.
If not, it’s just an allegation.
But Kean and Blumenthal and Coutlhart’s reporting indicates that he did, in fact, relay such things.
Which is it? No evidence, or enough for any willing investigator to learn the truth, if they bother to go there?
I mean, one of the named sources in the Debrief article is a former Army Colonel who worked with Grusch. He called Grusch’s assertion about the retrieval and reverse engineering of alien tech «fundamentally correct».
Why can’t the anonymous source tell us that. Why are they even anonymous?
If Bryan was really doing his job as a journalist (than making unintelligent remarks on twitter) , he would have known that Grusch has already submitted sworn evidence docs i.e. «extraordinary evidence» which include key personnel names, key sites etc. to the ICIG and Congress , contents of which were not disclosed to the public.
Grusch has a lot to lose if his «evidence» were proven fake, inaccurate or exaggerated.
Isn’t that the point of DG’s whole complaint; that his office (which was tasked with investigating and reporting back to congress), was being prevented access to the things that he was hearing about even though he theoretically should have been cleared.
Tweet is gone
This is how paid hacks are used.
Did Grusch ever say that he has evidence? No.
Grusch disclosed to NewsNation etc. that he told the IG what he learned from others in Government.
End of story.
It’s like they are mad that the story has legs.
I hope this is not the case but I would not be surprised at all. Hopefully someone will have the backbone to press grusch about this, respectfully of course.
Bryan Bender (@BryanDBender on Twitter) is an advisor to Americans for Safe Aerospace and an ex Politico and Boston Globe reporter who has previously pursued the UAP story. He states in a Tweet that Grusch’s claims have not been backed up by evidence according to his «well-placed sources:»
> [As far as I can tell from several well-placed sources involved in this whistleblower case, none of these claims have been backed up by evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668699262975373315?s=20)
> [I mean people who have seen the classified info agree that he is inferring things and relating second-hand knowledge, not direct evidence.](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668713094493933569?s=20)
…that he has no conflict of interest in asserting this:
> [I also think my five years of reporting on this topic makes clear I’m not in anyone’s pocket. And you’d be surprised how many tech companies want in on the govement’s UAP hunt. They think there might be real money in it.](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668721574118326272?s=20)
…and [questions](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668718290330615808?s=20) whether Grusch has actually submitted corroborating evidence.
https://i.imgur.com/rgSieyT.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/9vecCs5.jpg
> [Objective journalism is not automatically granting both sides equal weight. It is finding the objective facts. So far, we have none on this. And I’m told Congress doesn’t either.](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668713491405082630?s=20)
Just relaying the information for discussion in this community. I know Bender has been on the UAP beat, and found it interesting to hear him making these statements.
What even the point to do that if he doesn’t have any evidence to provide ?
I hope he has at least giving them some documents.
Well, then he tweeted this:
«Sometimes I tweet about the UAP issue just to thin the herd and see who I should block. It’s a very effective approach. 😂»
[https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668714616241922048?s=20](https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1668714616241922048?s=20)
So is he really relaying something truthful or trolling the UFO/UAP tweeters.
You don’t even need well placed sources to see this. The guy is so obviously full of shite to anyone not in the It’s Aliens cult.
More importantly, it is made even more obvious by how he is rolling this out and with whom he is rolling it out with. Kean, Blumenthal, Elizondo, Corbel, Culhart and Knapp are not credible people. They are alien and pseudoscience entertainment personalities looking for their next big franchise.
All of this nonsense is going to fall apart and yet this guy will still be featured by every It’s Aliens media outlet for decades.
I genuinely hope the NYTimes or Post does an expose on this It’s Aliens media cult that is creating this wooshit narrative. They are clearly being fed leaks that they use to manipulate the desperate rubes here.
Someone needs to expose how they are laundering this nonsense and manipulating public opinion and even Congress.
Bender on Grusch: «Bite my shiny metal ass.»
Bender probably lowkey mad that he didn’t get to break this story so now he’s trying to throw shade at it.
Ross said he presented the evidence. I’d listen to Ross before I listen to a robot from the future.
A rape victim doesn’t have to provide evidence.
A rape victim doesn’t have to investigate their own attack.
A rape victim shouldn’t be doubted unless evidence exists to the contrary
Alright, Bender. Back to sleep.