Выступление доктора Гарри Нолана на мероприятии iConnections SALT в Нью-Йорке — плюс комментарии к нашему обсуждению один на один

Hey folks, as promised OP has delivered. I was not able to ask many of the questions that I received from you, but I did get to speak with Garry Nolan for about 15 minutes one on one. I asked for permission to post the video and he gave me his blessing. He said he doesn’t post here anymore because he got «too many crazy DMs».

Some highlights from his panel:

1. About 7 years ago he was 2 weeks away from seeing a recovered craft that crashed, but then the rug was pulled out from underneath him
2. A whistleblower last week testified to Congress and it created a «hornets nest» in Washington
3. Everything we see is likely remotely controlled drones or AI

Ok so now for the juicier bits when I got to speak with him:

1. The Wilson Memo is legitimate
2. Bob Lazar is a fraud, he agrees with Dr. Eric Davis’ opinion
3. He resigned from TTSA because Tom Delong went off the deep end in some of the things he was posting and was hurting scientific discussion of the topic
4. He think that any bodies recovered are not actually aliens, but avatars that they created to interact with us
5. Whatever «it» is seems to be testing us and our intelligence to see if we can «peer behind the veil» — he made an analogy that we can make a robotic ant that can create pheromones to chemically speak with ants but we can’t teach them how to make an iPhone
6. There will be big news coming out later this summer that will turn heads and change opinion
7. He said Doty is full of BS
8. Dr. Avi Loeb went from a non-believer to fully believing ET is here in under a year due to all the ground work that has been laid out evidence wise
9. I mentioned Luis Elizondo’s video and how it didn’t help (was actually Cahill’s video) and Garry shrugged
10. He said that there may be various factions here of whatever we are dealing with, so it isn’t likely one entity or species
11. He agreed that some trusted names on the topic are Stanton Friedman, Jacques Valle, Avi Loeb. He had a low opinion of Neil Degrasse Tyson
12. He is close friends with Jeremy Corbell and said he has his place in the topic, but isn’t for everyone’s taste

Happy to answer any questions!

EDITS: edited some points with Garry’s feedback in the thread

Thank you so much for following through, I was really hoping you would and you didn’t disappoint.

A great contribution to the community and a generous move by you. Cheers!

Great post and thanks for quizzing Dr Nolan.

I’m starting to wonder if James Cameron knows something…

The Abyss foreshadowing the aliens coming from the ocean

Avatar foreshadowing what the aliens are doing to interact with us

Can I ask what was specifically said about the Wilson notes? Like what exact phrasing?

By the way for any that didn’t already know Nolan knows Davis, the supposed author of the notes personally, and has been able to easily know whether the notes are legitimate or not for a long time.

I’m not gonna lie, I’ve generally been pretty excited about everything coming out over the last while. But lately I’ve been getting a little anxious with the potential reality that we are facing. There’s gonna be so much to unpack, and some people are really not going to be well as a result of knowing about this kind of stuff.

This is amazing!!! So cool being at the forefront of this whilst my family thinks I’m nuts! Can’t wait for this summer 🧌

Here is the like to the full event

[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KDsgVHOUgss](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KDsgVHOUgss)

Awesome post thank you very much!
As far as I’m concerned the only people who don’t believe ETs are here are the ones that haven’t looked.
He said 100% chance I’d say 99% just because I myself haven’t seen one myself.

Thank you so much for this.

This was jaw dropping! Of course the one time I eat a weed gummy and then I see this lol.

I would like to see the evidence for myself but Nolan has credibility so this is big that he’s saying this.

So why this event? What is SALT? Who’s the audience?

Just wanted to say that you did a fantastic job with the interview. Historic.

A few follow up questions like the following would have been great:

* Why do UFOs crash with such frequency? and
* Why do the entities that control the UFOs not recover their craft? If humans aren’t supposed to «study» the aliens (his words), seems odd.

I was looking over the other speakers. Anthony Scaramucci was there so I’m going to have to look more into this.

May take one, maybe two Mooch’s to find answers

I’ll be stoked if the subject of that leaked phone call between kit green & Cay Randall-May was Nolan…

There are few issues of fact that contradict Nolans answers here.

First he said TTSA never offered stocks to thr public. SEC FILINGS for TTSA show that they did indeed offer 4 batches of Regulation A+ securities to the public seeking millions of dollars but selling very little.

Second he states that he left TTSA because of Delonges activities. However in a written comment he has been quoted In the past as saying it had nothing to do with Delonge but that he was focusing on his Stanford research.

Why the story change now?

[Article with quote about leaving TTSA](https://www.theufochronicles.com/2018/10/dr-garry-nolan-resigns-from-tom-delonge-UFO-research-firm.html)

Where is the video from when you speak to him?

This guy is psyops. Dont take the poison pill.

why would a scientist ever say they are 100% sure something is true?

Another red flag for me is the mention of Vallee and Friedman being trustworthy. Vallee has now fallen for this Trinity hoax, Friedman supports the MJ12 documents and brought us Roswell which all the firsthand witnesses describe as looking exactly like the remnants of strewn radar reflectors. I’d be very wary of this crash retrieval narrative

Just to be clear, all the real juicy stuff happened in a private, one-on-one conversation, with no witnesses, video, or audio recording?

I need to know why anyone is excited by this. Does OP have a stellar reputation or credentials that I’m unaware of? Please, fill me in.