Первоначально выпущенный в 1995 году, кадры якобы изображают тайное медицинское обследование инопланетянина, найденного во время крушения в Розуэлле в 1947 году. Эти кадры не уступают таким клипам, как фильм Запрудера и фильм Паттерсона, с точки зрения его позора. Когда он был выпущен, он произвел фурор: специальный репортаж, показанный по телевидению на канале Fox, набрал десятки миллионов просмотров. С тех пор создатель видео заявил, что отснятый материал является подделкой, хотя это воссоздание реальных кадров, которые они получили из анонимного источника, но они ухудшились из-за того, что было использовано несколько реальных кадров из этих материалов. Я думаю, что кадры невероятны и их стоит посмотреть, но я не представляю их ни реальными, ни фальшивыми. Я хочу, чтобы это обсуждалось. Если это манекен, который был построен, он смехотворно хорош и потребовал бы божественного количества времени, ресурсов и мастерства. На мой взгляд ничего сразу не выдает, гнется в суставах, имеет работоспособную анатомию, кровоточит при разрезе. Я хотел бы отметить, что у него шесть пальцев и нос, и поэтому он не вписывается в принятые в настоящее время знания о типичных серых.
Похожие записи:
Интересный материал
Статья в Википедии о заявлениях Груша
Внеземной спутник Black Knight находился на орбите Земли 13 000 лет
момент контакта
Аккаунты из первых рук
Джон Сопел и Эмили Мейтлис на слушаниях UAP.
Вы видели это видео из Турции/Ризе 2008 года (не из Кумбургаза)?
События, инициированные человеком (HICE), организованные в Мейденхеде, Англия, во время полевых работ в июле 1997 года.
Самое захватывающее видео.
Ядерные возможности, скомпрометированные UAP, — законный повод для секретности?
Did the creator ever released colored film, since he admitted the footage is fake? Did he ever showed us what puppet was used, since it is apparently so well made? Did he worked in the movie industry? How he acquired this level of special effects proficiency? Which were the doctors que consulted for to know what instruments and how an autopsy should proceed?
What if.. they were forced to say that it was fake.
I remember doing a long presentation on this in Middle School for a Talented and Gifted class I was in. I even rented the video from Blockbuster and showed it during my presentation.
He kinda looks like a stupid head 🤔
I love how it conveniently gets blurry in the close-ups so it hides detail.
The biggest giveaway it’s fake is that’s it’s not shot on 16 or 35mm film stock.
Anyone with a little knowledge of cameras can see this is shot on video. Looks like a 90s video camera to be exact.
I don’t think it’s real. The danger notice in the background looks too modern, that style isn’t common at all if you look up pictures of old signage.
The fingers and ears doesn’t seem to match up at least with this description, [nurse described beings at Roswell crash to mortician ](https://youtu.be/-_ft8Uew9XY)
I had to sign in, so I went to youtube app and typed the exact title word for word. Could not find it. Had to search the channel and scroll down 7 years, its 100% on youtube but Its not easy to find. I thought that was interesting.
Still never seen photos of this set, learned how they made the fake alien, seen this properly debunked, etc etc….
Well did any of the participants ever come forward? Guy behind the glass ever get identified with that many people who saw it? The blurriness on the zoom/close ups scream fake but… None of us probably will ever know… I am curious of anyone identified the man behind the glass….
Either way I think it’s a fantastic idea to re examine the so call debunked anything surrounding the UFO subject… so much mud and lies thrown around over the last 80 years …
Kit Green thinks it’s real and identical to ones he has seen. Santilli says they spliced in real footage that wasn’t too badly ruined. I think the quick clip when it looks like they are in a hangar with lots of people around, looks real to me
The UFO community is psychological warfare and many fraudsters for years have been trying to get attention. Until there is a world wide event with an actual ET encounter; then it will forever be the grainy footage and half truths.
What made this real for me was the way the dissection of the eyelids correlates with the post from the earlier this week.
Can someone send the youtube link? Cant play the video in reddit for some reason.
Commander Corso spoke in his book about a thin black film over the eyes that allowed the creatures to see in inferred. According to him we used them to developed night vision technology. The issue is that the book came out 2 years after this video was released. (The copyright information says 1995 and corso’s book wasn’t published till ‘97) so I guess it’s possible that corso just used that in the book based on this video but…seeing those lenses makes me think this film is real.
On the comment section of the video, the supposed creator gave a link to his facebook group and site. On the fb there are photos of the making of this model. It could be a reproduction, sure, but on 6:14 you can see the ligatures on the neck corresponding to the photos he has shown. Also, The Thing was made in 1982 and the fx guys from that movie could easily pull this off. The metal things at the end look like aluminum bars.
So most probably this is fake
No bone saw?? No bones to cut thru? He just done an autopsy on a giant gummy alien…
Link please. YouTube is age restricting the link through Reddit
This is simply not real. It’s a latex dummy.
Does anyone here remember this premiered on Fox after X-Files? It was the coolest that thing as a kid.
Guys, this is fake. You can see the artist’s work on his website:
https://www.johnhumphreyssculpture.com/page11/index.html
You mean the video that they remade because the totally real original video was destroyed?
Looks fake, was admitted as fake, so it is a FAKE
Does anyone here remember downloading this on Limewire and if you had a bad connection like me, it was an all day event 😭 😂
Is it cake?
This is the Ray Santilli’s fake… Everyone knows that.. right?
In 2006, Santilli admitted the film was not authentic but rather a staged reconstruction of footage he claimed to have viewed in 1992, but which had deteriorated and become unusable by the time he made his film.
Pretty elaborate for a hoax with no real pay off? I can’t imagine creating something so elaborate even today is very easy right?
Hands and feet are hard to sculpt to look perfect, much easier to cast human limbs to use for your alien project, also they conveniently blur the shots close up on the internal organs and stuff which would be very difficult to create.
I remember this being debunked because the phone on the wall has a curly cord.
A quick google suggests they weren’t mass introduced until the early 1950s.
I skimmed through the comments and saw the YT channel claiming it’s the creator of the video, but even before that I knew it was fake with one simple observation… If these were real trained doctors doing an autopsy of a being presumably from another world, and they are using all that protective equipment why in the world would they be taking notes with a pen and paper right next to the extracted organs? You know how deadly an event of cross contamination would be if it turns out that the body is carrying viruses or bacteria that are potentially airborne or can propagate by touch? You are telling a doctor would take that chance? Furthermore, when they are making incisions there’s no gas release, no blood splatter, not enough icky factor. Autopsies are way gross than that.