Раскрытие информации: «У нас есть корабли производства NHI, но мы не можем их эксплуатировать, а обратный инжиниринг оказывается невозможным из-за технологического разрыва» против «У нас есть работоспособные корабли, созданные человеком, использующие антигравитационные / безынерционные и аналогичные технологии NHI» — что мы получим?

It’s the first one.

The people who has talked about small fragments in their possession say it all looks to be built on the atomic scale. It’s the same with the «metallic foil» that reverts to its original shape several people have talked about throughout.

When you have materials that advanced it’s impossible for us to replicate it. If a craft is using liquid light circuitry for example, and any damage at all happened to it, then we can’t repair it yet in any way. We don’t have the engineering for it.

And liquid light metamaterials is just what is theoretically possible but way off in the future for us, it could easily be even more advanced than that which puts the goalpost even further away.

So one would need a pristine, safely landed craft to even have a chance at using it.

>Which one will we get?

What if you *get* neither…? Actually *reading* the language and criteria for technology sought after and considered eminent domain as specified in **section 3** of the [UAP Transparency Act of 2023](https://www.congress.gov/amendment/118th-congress/senate-amendment/797/text) — what’s considered *exempt* falls under the definition of *Prosaic Attribution,* clause 14:

>(14) **Prosaic attribution**.—The term «prosaic attribution»
**means having a human (either foreign or domestic) origin and**
**operating according to current, proven, and generally**
**understood scientific and engineering principles and**
**established laws-of-nature and not attributable to non-human**
**intelligence.**

You’ll find this reiterated in clause 18:

>(18) **Technologies of unknown origin**.—The term
«technologies of unknown origin» means any materials or
meta-materials, ejecta, crash debris, mechanisms, machinery,
equipment, assemblies or sub-assemblies, engineering models
or processes, damaged or intact aerospace vehicles, and
damaged or intact ocean-surface and undersea craft associated
with unidentified anomalous phenomena or **incorporating**
**science and technology that lacks prosaic attribution or**
**known means of human manufacture.**

Both clause 14 and 18, Section 3 of the Bill make a *presumption* that UAP technology exclusively uses technology and physical principals neither known or understood by our current (human) level of scientific understanding.

But what if actual, NHI technology actually uses physics we do understand, just applies it in a way we (humans) currently don’t **or** technology retro engineered from said *presumed* unknown technology has been rendered in less efficient though, nevertheless, perfectly functional physical principals we do understand, are known and have been applied…?

**It’s a serious point in defining criteria this Bill isn’t actually covering at all, in fact — currently — it appears to exist as a distinct loophole.**

Allow me to explain.

Both Ufology and this Bill makes this *presumption* that UFO’s, the craft we observe here in atmosphere, themselves are capable of interstellar travel and utilize technology necessary to facilitate that degree of travel to move about at will in our atmosphere. However, in a 76 year history nobody who ever claims to have witnessed a UFO has claimed to ever observe one traveling these degrees of distance: they’re only ever observed moving around either in or near earth atmosphere.

For all anyone *actually* knows these are relatively short-range, orbit-to-surface shuttle and reconnaissance craft: we don;t actually know how they do work, all we can say with reasonable certainty is that they aren’t applying flight as an operating principal — part and parcel of their defining physical characteristics relays an absence of either flight or flight control surfaces, a unidirectional rather than lifting body design and no apparent reliance on constant propulsion in order to stay in the air.

In practice this leaves us with either Gravametric methods or else Electro-Magnetic — ones a black hole when it comes to energy consumption, the other actively allows one to *generate* electrical energy direct from the earths magnetic field and utilities physics we do actually understand just generally don’t appear to employ…

My point is, according to these terms (14 and 18, section 3) as laid out in the Bill — anything of *unrecognized* technology and physics can and will be *automatically* seized — under eminent domain, they immediately fall under the US Governments possession and control — but if it *technically* falls under the definition of *prosaic attribution* it’s not empowered to be seized by this bill all.

Thus, if our *presumptions* regarding NHI technology are in anyway wrong and/or the SAP’s currently in possession of said technology and it’s derivatives can prove both consist of currently understood principals and/or said derivatives have been translated into currently understood technological working prototypes — this Bill as it stands basically allows all the above to remain exactly where it is…

Hidden.

We get neither option you surmise.

We talk a lot about how psi or some mental control is used to operate the craft, what if it is also used to build the materials?

I think some groups have been able to create ARVs like the TR3B and the Fluxliner but they are lying and saying they can’t reverse engineer it. I think certain materials or types of crafts are not reproducible but some appear to be. Maybe different aerospace companies have had more success than others.

I think we won’t be getting the full truth from Lockheed. They will probably move all their operational craft off-world or something lol.

The controls are in another dimension. You need to have the right mind.

I don’t think they’ll admit to having any crafts since we might have gotten them from another country and they might fight us for their return upon learning of this.

I think the best we get is that aliens are real, have been here, and that’s all that we know.

We might even be lead to believe (falsely) that they could be hostile so we need to increase our defense spending.

I don’t think right now, we will hear either, but it’s the former, certainly. The tech gap between them and us is probably huge. In the short time of human existence, even 2k years back, they would never be able to reverse engineer say.. an F15. They lack multiple scientific breakthroughs to even get there. Their tech could be what.. 10k, 100k.. 1 million years advanced? And perhaps even in other sphere of science completely.. built on a dimensional rules of which we have literally no concept.