Все хотят, чтобы это привлекло больше внимания СМИ, и Гади готов это сделать. Итак, если кто-то может помочь, я думаю, мы должны написать ему DM и помочь ему получить то, что ему нужно. Мысли?
There is a very specific list of at least 6 more people I need to talk to. If you follow all of this closely, you know who they are. If you are interested in “disclosure” you’ll help.
— Gadi Schwartz (@GadiNBC) July 12, 2023
u/Anon2World Get this moving on all MSM and it’s game over. Obfuscation of the topic is easy, the real pursuit should be following the money. Keep focus on the money, there are always mistakes made when money changes hands and someone was sloppy somewhere. Who runs the books for these SAPs? I mean the actual bean counters. They don’t see the exciting stuff, all they do is move numbers around. Who’s doing that type of work.
I saw AK’s multiple posts over the last week and a half. I recognized the name easily but many didn’t. I don’t think they realize that the leaks carried out by Anon over the last decade+ have helped this process tremendously. Exposing all of their shady activities helps people open up to the idea of NHI and some of the more interesting claims that have been made.
The whistleblower claims are being pulled in many directions but there is one singular point here that should be focused on if you’re the real deal and want to make this shit come to a head: Someone is spending money they shouldn’t be.
Submission statement: Gadi Schwartz said on twitter in response to Ross Coulthart, “No yawns here. Personally, I’ve been salivating to cover tangible evidence of such an important story. But a through vetting of both possibilities posed there by @marcorubio takes time. Especially given their EXTREMELY consequential nature.” He said he needs to get in contact with 6 ppl, idk who he’s talking about but if you want to get this more media coverage and know someone who might know someone maybe now is the time to make that call.
Could he be talking about the 6 people Danny Sheehan referenced in that daily mail article.
Damn. Working on the story for 5 weeks and he hasn’t been able to get in touch with Shellenberger’s whistleblowers?
Why does everyone who enters this field start speaking in tongues after a certain point in time? 🤔
Highly infuriating! Just publish the names of the six people who you would like to interview and see if any of your followers know these people. What is the deal with these indirect insinuations?
He’s talking to Ross and he says he needs to talk to six people?
He was already talking to one and he didn’t recognize the value of it. Not only that, he was talking to a person that could have put him in touch with all the right people, as many as he could handle.
But nope. Not good enough for Gadi.
Since the beginning, I’ve never liked the way Schwartz has been handling this.
Why doesn’t Gadi just slide into Ross’ DMs. Unless there’s bad blood between themselves
From Miss Rachel to Anchor
Doesn’t «six people» simply refer to the six who are reported to have testified in confirmation of Grusch’s claims? If this is the case, I don’t necessarily blame him for being cryptic. But who is to ever say on this topic?
Get Gary Mackinnon back on the case. They tried to extradite him for years after he hacked certain systems!