Ави Леб, профессор Гарварда, объясняет предвзятое отношение научного сообщества к исследованиям UAP, сравнивает их с исследованиями других недоказанных теорий в основной науке и призывает к дополнительным исследованиям.
How can you conclude there is no evidence before the research is conducted?
byu/Sunshine_N_Sparkles inUFOs
Похожие записи:
Мошенница по изменению климата (Грета) может попасть в тюрьму за правонарушение в Швеции
Не нашел кокаина из Белого дома. Не нашел утечку Верховного суда. Не удалось найти, кто установил самодельные бомбы. О, смотрите, еще один посетитель J6 найден!
Бывшая детская звезда Кори Фельдман рассказывает о своих голливудских заявлениях о педофилии.
Телевизионный контроль над разумом
Самый странный апокалипсис
В тихий летний день, когда никто не смотрит, появляются новости о том, что Трамп знал и финансировал Уханьскую исследовательскую лабораторию, откуда появился Covid-19.
Если бы теракты 11 сентября произошли в России, американцы указали бы на очевидность причастности правительства.
Комитет Палаты представителей проведет слушания по НЛО на следующей неделе
Исследование медиумизма и экстрасенсорного опыта
180 градусов: отучиться от лжи, в которую вас научили верить
I fucking love Avi Loeb
Yep, this guy is going to go down in history. He’s one of the most level headed scientists with a voice in this. Period. And what he’s doing makes perfect logical sense to the point that it’s easily defendable should his research not turn up anything concrete. It needs to be done.
They need to allow Dr Loeb access to the exotic material.
Extraordinary evidence requires extraordinary funding, is his point here. The evidence doesn’t just materialize, it is found, with extraordinary investigation backed by extraordinary funding.
The problem in getting from point A to B is of course the stigma on the subject from the decades of mis/disinformation. Ideally we are rounding that curve soon.
Long ago, I thought it was going to be someone like Neil DeGrasse Tyson saying things exactly like this, in a motivating way, to push people to keep looking into the seemingly impossible and presently unknown.
Boy was I wrong lol
Avi Loeb for President.
Man I love this guy!
Who is the interviewers name? I’ve been looking for his yt channel.
Someone tell him about all the inventors that were killed. And the invention secrecy act of 1951.
I typically don’t agree with Loeb’s approach to scientifically isolate parameters of UAP research (especially given UAPs well-known abilities to avoid good tracking), but I gotta say he makes an incredible point here.
There’s absolutely enough data to warrant well-funded research into UAP and their extraordinary capabilities, and scientist should be willing to be open minded.
Whether it’s official radar/electromagnetic/satellite image tracking or regular reports from ordinary people, if even 1% of the claims are true, than that means there’s something in our skies/space/oceans that we are wholly unaware of how it functions, even on a basic level. That alone should be enough to require at least the slightest bit of interest in research.
All excellent points.
Because we already have evidence. This makes no sense. The people in the legacy program have submitted evidence to the committee and to the appropriate IC officials. Don’t expect it to be immediately available for public release yet
He just doesn’t know yet, like us without knowing paid our taxes and funding to which programs.
My and my spouse (both academic backround) often ponder why the hell some scienctists are so reluctant to actually learn anything new. Does new challenge their world view? Cause uncomfortable feelings? Ethics of science dictate to follow the evidence and method.
If evidence points out to something new, it should not be discarded. Yes. It is possible that own work has been futile. Yes it feels very bad to be «wrong».
But Science does not advance without risks, without embracing challenges. Personal emotions should be inferior to learning new and advancing collective good.
I pucking hate people who cling to their truths just because, ignoring all evidence «There is no climate change». «Red meat is healthy» etc. Tbh many people seem really really stupid.
It’s kind of strange to see a physicist frame the LHC as a frivolous investment that hasn’t had any returns. I would be surprised if that thing hasn’t paid for itself at this point.
I agree with the broader point, more research funding that’s agnostic in terms of purpose is great, but CERN/the LHC has been very helpful in our understanding of physics/reality and the way it’s characterized here is off putting.
Because we already have evidence
What an ass 🎩. Oh my God. Is he really comparing funding the building and running of a particle collider with an investigation to unearth ships we are supposed to already have in our possession? It’s like comparing apples and Cadillacs. I can’t even begin to imagine having the audacity to think people are this stupid. It really makes me wonder if he has a vested interest in all of this at some level…