Интересные параллели между Грушем и Ноланом в их описаниях странных изотопных соотношений.
Interesting parallels between Grusch and Nolan in their descriptions of strange isotopic ratios
byu/joeyisnotmyname inUFOs
Интересные параллели между Грушем и Ноланом в их описаниях странных изотопных соотношений.
Interesting parallels between Grusch and Nolan in their descriptions of strange isotopic ratios
byu/joeyisnotmyname inUFOs
I watched the phenomenon the other night and this particular subject stood out to me a ton. The one main guy in the film had metal samples he claimed were retrieved from crafts, and the analysis showed this isotope anomaly among some of the metal elements present in whatever alloy it was. Wouldn’t this be some kind of smoking gun if true? If that metal alloy with its constituents in crazy isotope form can’t occur on earth naturally, and humans aren’t capable of “forging/engineering” it themselves, it leaves limited options. Someone or something made it, and brought it here.
I would think this would be one of the main focuses UAP investigative efforts, and of reverse engineering efforts. How can humans engineer and forge these alloys required to build craft capable of space travel?
I used to work in an aluminum factory that made a variety of alloys, and they had an experimental division that was always trying to make a new miracle alloy. They’d use all kinds of metal mixtures, some very toxic. They had some unique results. I used to love to think they were trying to find the right alloy mix for a space craft.
He has seen exotic material and documents himself. So he’s probably basing this knowledge on his own personal experience that matches Dr. Nolan’s own personal experience.
You know what they say patterns make stories.
Almost as if one could have known about the other?
As a chemical engineer, unless this guy shows me a stable Moscovium isotope or something crazy like that, then it is not proof of non human engineering.
I remember listening to the Rogan episode with knapp and Corbell where they go in depth about the iron isotope spacing in recovered metal, some metals being up to 26 layers thick and different microns of thickness with different curvatures in the layers and it was just clear it was from no process from this earth. I believe the Jacques Vallee episode he speaks more to the construction processes of the metal
This doesn’t really say anything one way or the other.
Obviously if it’s true, yeah their stories would match.
If he’s a hoaxer, he could have just listened to Nolan and parroted his story because he thought it would give him more credibility.
Nolan is far more credible here. We absolutely have the technology to mess with the isotopic ratios of metals if we want to, that’s what uranium enrichment is, same with heavy water for nuclear reactors. It would be very expensive and serve no practical purpose in the case of magnesium that I’m aware of, but in no way proves non-human origin.
Did Grusch get this info directly from Nolan? Why was Grusch so convinced this had non-human origins, while Nolan expressed more reservations about his conclusions?
This is literally only convincing to stupid people. Of course there are multiple ways to identify materials by molecular composition, and this is just one relatively expensive method. Materials engineers cringing right now.
The concept of physical intergalactic travel requires transportation, or perhaps the earthling elders are that advanced with the materials here
I watched the Grusch interview, it’s a compelling watch however it’s all «trust me» with no actual evidence. The other dimensions he talks about to excuse the possibility that NHI may not be alien is absolute rubbish and makes him sound at best that his understanding of physics is at a misunderstood popular science level.
I’m new to this sub and probably don’t hold the beliefs that many seem to have on this sub, I was hoping that Grusch might have a better argument than the «trust me» one.
Copying Nolan’s known talking points is a red flag.
Also claiming that additional spatial dimensions are well known is a crock. This is not standard accepted physics, only string theory and sub theories touch on this, fringe at best. Coming from someone who supposedly studied physics, this is a major red flag.
One of the better post I’ve seen surrounding all the hype the last couple days. However, I’m still prepared to be disapointed.
what’s to say that this isn’t some sort of weird chemical reaction that happened between say, two asteroids hitting eachother and some of the metals “combining” or something? over multiple thousands of years?
idk, if someone could explain to me how this is proven to be “manufactured” then i’d be more willing to accept this as any sorta news, no disrespect..
This is what quacks sounds like. This is how they sounded like back in medieval times and this is how they sound like right now. Giving a seemingly scientific explanation to something they have no scientific knowledge about. «Strange materials»? What does that even supposed to mean? It means he has no actual idea what he’s talking about and just pulling scientific terms out of his a**. Probably combining words from other quacks he listened to. The scientific community, people who dedicated their lifes to learning and knowledge, is laughing at you. Yes YOU! Get out there and breathe in some fresh air before your brain starts to rot. Or better yet, go to school, get a degree and start understanding that this is FAR from any truth to live by. It’s entertainment folks, nothing else. Don’t kid yourself and get a life. It’ll do you (and humanity) a good deed.
…and the analysis of a exploded sphere that crashed. Not by Nolan. It’s on this sub as well.
I’d be surprised if Nolan has not participated in lab exams of the exotic materials that were mentioned. Who else has a device to probe atomic building structures?
Couldn’t Dave have watched this interview, though?
I was also thinking about Gary when Grusch mentioned people having health issues after dealing with craft. Didn’t Gary study the effects that interactions with craft had on his patients brains?
[deleted]