Конгрессмен из комитета по разведке говорит, что НЛО «бросают вызов физике, какой мы ее знаем, и летают под водой»

It’s interesting how the news article from 1890 doesn’t sensationalize it at all and just reported what happened.

Whenever it says «Congressman» I get my hopes up it is someone other than Tim, it’s *always* Tim.

> A Tennessee congressman investigating UFOs claims the crafts appear to ‘defy physics as we know it.’

>Republican Tim Burchett believes there is no question the objects in the skies are not of this Earth and have abilities to fly underwater and never leave behind heat trails.

>Burchett — who is on the House Oversight Committee overseeing UFO hearings — has been shown classified footage not yet released to the public.

>The congressman told the Event Horizon podcast this week that ‘we’ve been dealing [with government coverups] since 1947, probably since about 1897 in what was the Aurora Texas ‘UFO crash.’

I think the fact they can “fly” underwater, and also leave no heat trail/condensation trail, indicates they aren’t interacting with our dimension in the same way we do. They seem to be able to operate “shifted” between our dimension and something else, maybe something outside our physical dimension but inside our space time.

Burchett and the Daily Mail? Sometimes I feel like we’ll never be taken seriously by the wider public.

If you really think about it just the government admitting there’s something else here would open up an absolutely gigantic can of worms. I can hardly imagine all the things we’ve been kept in the dark about.

I have found the USO side of things even more interesting than UFOs.

For what it’s worth:
During the big UFO flap of 1972-73 my elderly uncle told me that as children, he, my father, and aunt “watched them [UFOs] flying around at night.”
This would have been around the time of WWI or a few years earlier in farm country, Nowhere, Nebraska. Yes, airplanes existed then, but he was not talking about airplanes. Biplanes would have been rare in that region and my uncle would have surely known the difference. He simply accepted UFOs from the early Twentieth Century as real whatever they were.
My father and mother, born 1906 and 1910, both remembered the first automobiles they ever saw.

It doesn’t “fly”

Think about it…the object isn’t using aero to create lift. It’s using technology that displaces it and makes it as if it isn’t there. No wonder it can “fly” under water. It’s using gravity to propel itself and displace air/water and god knows what else, for all we know maybe even time itself

well they are not really «flying» are they? they are using gravity to repel air particles….a kind of «bubble» effect … no reason why that wouldn’t also work with water particles.

A real congressman or one of the really dumb ones who got there by appealing to even dumber people?

Yup, that’s what I thought.

It’s oceanic swamp gas

Just drop the bombshell and usher in world peace already.

How we are supposed to act now that we have congress officials chiming in, saying UAP’s and their abilities are legitimate? What’s the next step? Are we supposed to be pist, tearing up the neighborhoods, happy or sad, may be confused or all the above.

So random that I was literally just telling a friend about the Aurora crash and how they buried an alien what is it when you coincidentally talk about something and then it happens

[removed]

To be fair humans also have the technology to turn humans into “charcoal briquettes.”

I’m always entertained by the people’s thoughts on UAPs going underwater. They seem surprised. If an alien civilization has the ability to travel to a planet compromised 2/3 ocean, from so far away, they’re obviously capable of (and prepared for) going underwater. Not to mention, it’s the best place to conceal themselves.

Because if one person you should trust with a physics problem is a congressman who doesn’t know how WIFI works.

Inter-dimensional versions of us trying to save us from ourselves