Джереми Кеньон Локьер Корбелл в Твиттере — просочившийся документ, в котором говорится, что Канада владеет разбившимся UAP
GO GO UFO and GO GO CANADA!!! 🇨🇦
Gimme Some Truth @G_Knapphttps://t.co/k1tvpHUj1o pic.twitter.com/cq1ajt2DhV
— Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell (@JeremyCorbell) June 20, 2023
Interesting that this was written one month after they shot down that object flying over Canada.
It says «upcoming public announcements by aucus»
BRICS WERE DEFECATED
They say that if you shout Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell 3 times your curiosity gets instantly weaponized.
SS: document leaked to Corbell and Knapp from a MP from Canada, talking about recovered crashed UAP. Pretty big deal IMO, figured I’d post here for people to see that don’t have Twitter. The snowball rolling downhill keeps getting bigger.
If this document is real then it actually points to a few things.
This is more fuel for the fire, this is stating that Canada and 5 Eyes are working together to reverse engineer UAP material and that they have had it for 70 years.
So if this is to be believed (and so far I am leaning towards that it is) the following people have knowledge of and possess material:
Canadian Government
American Government
Australian Government
UK government
If you believe Grusch (He is credible, likely telling the truth) then so does:
Italian government
The Vatican
China
Russia
Am I missing any countries/governments that likely are part of this or have programs?
So this is the 24h Bombshell.
Looking at his wikipedia page, it does not seem to be a kooky MP.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Maguire](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Maguire)
So now waiting for any kind of reactions on : [https://twitter.com/LarryMaguireMP](https://twitter.com/LarryMaguireMP)
If this was confidential communication, we might hear crickets.
So this document is really odd to me. I’m not trying to debunk but something isn’t sitting right with me. If you are Canadian, writing about Canada, in a document meant for Canadians — why would you use the word Canada so often? Let’s say I’m working for GE and writing a letter to GE shareholders or executives — it’s implied that the company you are talking about is GE. You don’t need to mention the company name 14 times on the first page. Its really weird to me how Canada is mentioned over and over and over again. My gut feeling is this was written by a non Canadian trying to make this look like it was written by a Canadian.
One thing that *really* bothers me. Where in the letter does it say Canada is in possession of a crashed UAP? The closest it comes that I can see is where it mentions DRDC having participated in the study of recovered foreign material which could just as well be scraps of foil or slag for all we know. Somewhere the post title seems to have made a massive leap that is not supported by the source material.
Hilarious that we have to get through 4 of that tart’s names before we get to the actual headline.
It has no bearing on the authenticity of the document, but am I crazy for thinking the image header is a bit tacky? I deal with paperwork a lot, and busy graphics on important paperwork pisses me off for no reason.
Kenyon Lockyer? JeKeLoCo
This is still just smoke until they offer evidences.
And by now those of us who don’t see this as a cult or a religion; we are tired of so much smoke.
“FMP”?
Is this a common acronym used to describe more “terrestrial” material programs?
Is this a new acronym being used in the context of UAPs?
If so, we should message the black vault to open up (another) new line of enquirey for FOIA. If it’s new, that’s very interesting.
This is a mislabeled post. Stop making shit up.
4 names? What a tool
Corbell sucking his own dick so hard right now
Were you watching live as well?
I think he needs more names in there so we don’t get confused about who’s who.
Canada’s military is tightly integrated with the US military, plus NORAD and NATO, so anything is possible I think. There have been several unexplained UFO cases in Canada over the years.
So, where exactly in that document does it say they actually have recovered material? I don’t see that anywhere in the document.
This guy is a nobody saying things he heard on YouTube… it’s not a leak if you wrote it and provide no evidence..
A week ago everyone was bashing him for the triangle ufo video that he didn’t do his research on and now we are back in the dick riding train again I see.
Colour me confused, but what part of that says Canada is in possession of crashed UAP’s?