Полковник Росс Дедриксон (ВВС США): «Пришельцы не допускают в космос ядерное оружие». — Объекты в форме блюдца над DC

Not sure if I read the comments here right, but Colonel Dedrickson is indeed a Colonel, and everything about his background checks out, including masters degree and so on: https://np.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/cijdzt/some_skeptics_yesterday_were_questioning_whether/

This guy comes across as very credible. The different jobs that he held down for the different agencies and corporations, all relating to the nuclear field, supports what he is telling us. His career path had a nuclear focus, and just so happened to provide him unique perspective of what the security’s crews on the storage/manufacturing facilities we’re reporting….. or in this case reluctant to report.

I really am beginning to believe that the world is on the edge of a major paradigm shift. Can’t keep that Genie bottled up for much longer.

Maybe instead of the meditation experiment, we should experiment with firing nukes all over the planet and see what happens.

Colonel Dedrickson is a retired Colonel from the USAF. He went to Stanford Business School where he studied management. Back in the 50’s, part of his responsibilities included maintaining the inventory of the nuclear weapon stockpile for the AEC and accompanying security teams checking out the security of the weapons. Many reports kept coming in that UFOs were seen at various nuclear storage facilities and some of the manufacturing plants. He has seen them himself many times and was present when the famous fly-over over the Capitol happened in July of 1952.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7mEnmx1HIo

Greer gets a bad rep but the testimonies on Sirius Disclosure are pretty interesting.

You know I could understand the logic of it if they have sensitive equipment in orbit or something, not wanting the monkeys to break their cameras.

See, my issue with this can be brought down to a smaller scale and compared to guns in America. Any reasonable and logical person can see that the abundance of guns in America lead to a spill off affect that can result in mass murders or senseless murders, or intimidation, or many of other things that are adverse to an advanced society. Which we are, we aren’t the most advanced but we are advanced. Even still, the government doesn’t move on getting a tighter grip on the abundance of guns. Some guns should be outright banned from production from companies that aren’t specifically selling to the military. Say what you want about the second amendment and it’s purposes. I’m not debating that, I’m saying from a completely objective and logical standpoint. Certain weapons should not sniff the air outside of war zones and military bases. But that’s us, human beings, there are very human reasons why that would never happen.

I say that all to say, they know just as well as we know, that we are humans. In the grand scheme of things we are idiots. Allowing us to have nukes would be like allowing Gorillas at the zoo to have pistols. Won’t take them long to figure out what they can do, once one figures out what they can do. Then they become very dangerous not only to other Gorillas but to families that visit the zoo. Why would they allow us to have them knowing, absolutely one day we will be stupid apes with our pistols? If we cause so much damage with them, and it’s mostly due to things we don’t completely understand, why even let us have them?

Something about it just doesn’t add up, interfere enough to disable them in isolated cases, but don’t outright interfere enough to eliminate them all together. And if it’s cause nuclear knowledge is a puzzle piece to a larger equation in the future of humanity evolving. Why not just bestow the other part of that puzzle. Because if history has shown us anything. It’s that every advancement man makes, its first WEAPONIZED, before it’s used for a meaningful purpose.

If Nukes are a part of a puzzle, you can best believe when we figure out the next part, it’s going to be more dangerous than nukes and it’s gonna be a weapon. Just give us the whole picture so we can see what’s it’s supposed to be so we don’t be the problem that we are for them in trying to figure it out ourselves.

That’s the way I think a logical being would think, but these beings don’t seem to be doing that. So either they aren’t logical, or we don’t have a future that matters to them. If that’s the case, they aren’t here for us at all. We are bugs in a home that they frequent.

No nuclear weapons in space!?!? The biggest nuclear reaction in our solar system is the sun.

Nukes become pretty inconsequential in space.

RKMs are way more destructive. A baseball accelerated to 90% c would be more devastating than any amount of nukes.

I think this guy is full of it and has no idea what he’s talking about.

Incredible, not just that but that everything he said… fits

i really hope this guy aint just some crazy person

If true,this many of our worst nightmares , that aliens are really involved in setting US government and DOD policy .

They also may be opposed to disclosure, that would certainly explain a lot of the governments behavior , in continually denying the obvious for years .

I have always believed in ET visitation, but I never would have believed this . Hopefully it’s not true .

Cool story. Who’s «aliens».

I’m tired of this cat mouse game

How does a nuke auditing job put you in a position with overbearing knowledge of a whole bunch of ufo incidents, including moon missions and an explanation for why the aliens were doing it?

But then also describe some of the cases with no additional (inside) info beyond what we’ve already seen on tv/internet, like that «ufo shines beam on missile» story, for example?

The witness is explaining things beyond his point of view, imo.

Can someone smarter than me explain what he means when he said after they dropped the nuke in the pacific there was ‘communications’

Always wondered why [DART](https://www.nasa.gov/planetarydefense/dart/dart-news)was a «kinetic impact» like you couldn’t put a little warhead on that thing? come on man