Оригинальное видео FLIR о авиалайнере в архивах 2014 года о машине обратного пути здесь:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140827060121/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShapuD290K0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShapuD290K0
(http://web.archive.org/web/20140827060121/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShapuD290K0) Был закодирован в 2016 году: Дата кодирования: UTC 21-08-2016 19:49:45 Стереоскопическая версия ([http://web.archive.org/web/20140827052109/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ok1A1fSzxY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ok1A1fSzxY
(http://web.archive.org/web/20140827052109/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ok1A1fSzxY)) был закодирован в 2014 году, как я и ожидал: Дата кодирования: UTC 2014-05- 19 03:59:26 Как в архиве YouTube WBM 2014 года может быть видео, которое было закодировано 2 года спустя?
Sometime around 2016 YouTube updated their video codec and as a result re-encoded all videos on the platform, you’ll notice some videos uploaded before this time that were listed as HD at the time, now dropped to 480p or even 360p, because the kbps fell below the new requirements for full HD video.
I don’t know anything about the subject matter, but I used Google for you.
https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/5318/how-does-youtube-encode-my-uploads-and-what-codec-should-i-use-to-upload
https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/22484/when-does-youtube-reencode-videos
Disclaimer: I am a complete dumb ass and this may be entirely unrelated to the question in your post.
Oh crap, I didn’t think of this, but I believe there was a huge migration to mp4 when they started officially supporting HTML video protocols. During the web’s migration away from .flv video. Could it have been encoded during that!?
For us laypeople, can you explain what that observation means?
I definitely saw the FLIR video in summer of 2014. because I laughed it off as absurd.
These aliens are dumb… they are still 3-ball technology to create portals? Lmao …. we’ve been doing it with two balls for years.
I have a huge problem with the FLIR footage that I just noticed, someone created a thread talking about the cumulus clouds and my argument was that the plane could be much higher since this is a top down satellite view.
HOWEVER looking at the flir now, at the start of the video you can see the perspective of the clouds changing which indicates to me that the drone and the aircraft are only a couple of thousand feet above the cloud tops, that’s not enough altitude for the aircraft to form contrails in my view, even if the cloud tops are at 15000 for example, it doesn’t look right to me now.