Сложил синие и красные линзы от 3D-очков, и я запечатлел НЛО.

By admin Май28,2023 #Внеземные существа #Внекосмические существа #Внешний вид пришельцев #Загадки инопланетного воздействия #Загадки инопланетных цивилизаций #Инопланетная жизнь #Инопланетные существа в кино #Инопланетные технологии #ИнопланетныеВоздействия #Инопланетяне #ИнтеракцияСИнопланетянами #Интракосмические существа #Исследование инопланетной жизни #Контакт с инопланетянами #Космические пришельцы #Межзвездные путешествия #Научная фантастика #Популярные о пришельцах #Пришельцы в алфавите #ПришельцыВНауке #ПришельцыИлюди #связанные с пришельцами #Способы общения с пришельцами #Телешоу на инопланетянах #Теории заговоров о пришельцах #Уроки инопланетной истории. 窗体顶端 窗体底端 ЭкспериментыПришельцев #Фантастические инопланетяне #Фильмы о пришельцах #Фэндом пришельцев #Экзобиология #ЭкспериментыНадЛюдьми #Явления
Сложил синие и красные линзы от 3D-очков, и я запечатлел НЛО.,


Сложил синие и красные линзы от 3D-очков, и я запечатлел НЛО.,

Обратите внимание на верхнюю треть экрана. Сигарообразный объект летит на большой высоте слева направо. Я снял его на свой iPhone 12 mini в замедленном режиме.

Stacked blue and red lenses from a 3-D set of glasses, and I’ve been capturing these things flying around.
byu/noric_west inUFOs

By admin

Related Post

46 комментарий для “Сложил синие и красные линзы от 3D-очков, и я запечатлел НЛО.”
  1. It would be helpful if you had two cameras side by side videoing. If one camera had the filter and the other didn’t that would prove whether the filters had anything to do with it or not. I’d switch the filter back and forth to verify it’s not an effect of the specific camera. If it really is the result of the filters, I would video again with both cameras having filters (it would be best if the cameras were identical) and side by side. If the cameras lie in the same plane, that is they should be on a flat surface, the difference in the position of the objects in the video will give you an estimate of the size, distance, speed of the object.

  2. r/theydidthemath

    The object is in the frame for about 40 frames. At 240 fps (the slowest iphone slow-mo) that is 166ms.

    If the object were an insect 1 meter away, it would be covering maybe 30cm of travel (I’m guessing on FOV but sounds right for the 1x camera) and have a speed of 2 m/s or 7 km/h (easy for an insect). At 100 meters it would be 700 km/h, and if much more than that it would be supersonic.

    If you can use a second phone 1+ meters away to create enough parallax to prove it’s at least 10m away, you would be onto something.

    Ideally you’d also need to sync the timestamps of the videos, which might be hard on an iphone (not sure). This will be necessary if the object moves in the same direction as the phones are separated. A low-tech method would be to suspend a high-precision stopwatch or something spinning at high speed in view of both cameras. Although if it’s just an insect the second phone wouldn’t even capture it so might be a moot point.

    Good luck.

  3. Tom King and Custodian Files, both YouTube channels, have been tracking these things flying around everywhere. Custodian is in L.A. and Tom King is in Phoenix. Tom was actually one of the original witnesses to the Phoenix lights back in 1997.
    What’s interesting is Toms video(s) seem to show these uap flying around in a pattern. He went on the Chris Lehto files recently and was speaking on how it seems these uap were almost ‘encoding’ something into the sky. He even traced out it’s reoccurring path on the video. I’ll leave the link to the actual video he was showing off his personal channel. But it’s definitely something I would love to start doing as well. Very interesting we the common people can now start our own investigations.
    Tom King’s Video Link: https://youtu.be/amc0wO2bsyk

  4. I might have to try this. I’ve been watching the FARSIGHT team do videos like this. They are using infrared filters and high frame per second video to catch objects like this. They are teaching people the specs and parameters to video MANY objects flying around just outside our observable light spectrum.

  5. The flying route dosnt looks that high in altitude. It more like behaves like a bird. I doubt that you are filming UAPs. I mean you could easily proof us by filming it twice with a normal cam and your filter.

    But till then this is not a cigar shaped object, but a bird for me

  6. I bet you would have captured the same thing without the glasses.

    I’m extremely doubtful that you have any evidence which would indicate that was high altitude. The video itself, indicates it wasn’t (see the clouds).

  7. This reminds me of that story I heard once, that night vision originally displayed as red, the only problem is soldiers kept seeing the craziest things, demons, and weird apparitions. But only with the goggles on. They then switched them to green.

  8. I was reading about the color purple. It technically isnt real, what we see is a construct of our brain. Purple isnt represented in the natural spectrum. So if some species of intelligent animals either naturally developed or made materials out of «things» outside the spectrum or that cancel out other colors then they could fly or walk around unseen by the naked eye.

  9. I actually feel like this could be a legit capture, but I dunno about the whole 3D glasses part. OP, can you post the other videos you’ve mentioned? Because right now I kinda think you would’ve just gotten this without the two layers of plastic film on your lens.

  10. So what you did is put a purple colored lense over your camera? Annnnd that’s giving a view into a whole new spectrum, seeing things that couldn’t be seen until you looked through purple? This is just birds. Birds in purple.

  11. A bird or bug that appears “cigar shaped” because you are using slow motion.

    The filters did nothing other than changing the colors and, significantly, lowering the amount of light coming in and your phone compensated by lowering its shutter rate even more producing that blur or streaking effect (some folks will say “rods”).

  12. Cool video, like your approach. Question though, what is the general concensus on what they are doing should it be a UAP? Flying around with no purpose seems implausable unless you want to get caught, which again wouldn’t make sense

  13. I’ve heard there is a way to remove a layer on a full frame camera to make it Ultra Violent light sensitive or something and saw a video where in normal light a person couldn’t see an object but with UV light they could. Might be worth looking into

  14. Heard about vets in Vietnam that had red night vision goggles that went crazy with them on because they saw demons and Evelin spirits. Search up red night vision goggles Vietnam cia officer or something like that . Try with just the red lense next

  15. Sometimes I wonder if some of yall are larping. Also you must be smoking some new cigar cause thats not the shape im seeing . Much more round than cigar. Oh and high altitude? I get the sense its no more than a couple dozen feet above.

  16. Seeing people referring to «cloaking» always makes me laugh. Having said that, I’ve once again wandered into the sub where some people use the phrase «galactic federation» and actually believe in it so there’s that.

  17. For those of you having trouble seeing it:

    [ENLARGEMENT](https://imgur.com/42YdT3M)

    You know, to see something in 3-D you need to take it with either two cameras at the same time with lenses displaced horizontally approximately 64mm apart with a different filter applied to each lens. Unless you have a 3-D camera like I do.

  18. I believe some UFOs are from another dimension and they come to our dimension to watch us and they also have tech so they can see between them. Their dimension is layered on top ours. So I think we can one day make tech to do the same.

  19. Your approach should be of high interest to Avi Loeb.

    What needs to be done is pinning down the way their cloaking works in effect, that is, how to circumvent it.

    For your example, the question might be, whether that is really about filtering two colors or whether you inadvertently built a polarization filter.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *