Очень большой UAP пересекает северную часть Тихого океана: наблюдение пяти пилотов, два фото и видео — Пункт повестки дня конференции Научной коалиции по исследованиям UAP (SCU) 2023 г.


Очень большой UAP пересекает северную часть Тихого океана: наблюдение пяти пилотов, два фото и видео — Пункт повестки дня конференции Научной коалиции по исследованиям UAP (SCU) 2023 г.

34 комментария для “Очень большой UAP пересекает северную часть Тихого океана: наблюдение пяти пилотов, два фото и видео — Пункт повестки дня конференции Научной коалиции по исследованиям UAP (SCU) 2023 г.

  1. I wonder what the context was. Also, where are the pictures and video? Seems to sound like a cigar shaped craft, like that video that was posted recently on here I think from Hungary.

  2. Richard Griffiths has a very credible CV and the abstract is the sort of measured statement you see in serious journals. However I looked through the ArXiv pre-print server and don’t find any mention of this work. Quite possible that he decided not to publish a pre print. Will be very interesting to see what he says. However a sighting with so many witnesses should have been known by this community by now? That’s a bit puzzling to me. If there was imagery it should have been available from other sources as the paper’s authors are not the source of the imagery. They are using data from other observers

    Great find though. Thanks for flagging this Sabine

  3. Link to conference, which will be at the end of July https://www.explorescu.org/conferences

    Direct link to the agenda item https://whova.com/embedded/session/yhzhhSO0s3T8TbISu9q84rsosNSR6Lds870fqmk%4045c%3D/2896364/?widget=primary

    >>We describe a **non-military observation of a UAP** by multiple observers, with two cell-phone photos and a video. The observations are inexplicable on the basis of current human technology, because the craft was at least a mile long, glowing against the dark sky, and was moving at about 20,000 mph with no aerodynamic supporting surfaces. There are no corroborating radar or other observations. Upper limits are placed on the gravitational lensing of background field stars in the vicinity of the craft: future observations of this kind may possibly be used to unambiguously identify extraterrestrial craft and to constrain their propulsion mechanism.

    Non-military means they can’t classify this shit. Unless they want to step up and claim it as ours. 🧐

    >>Prior to the observations of this large craft, four or five ‘orbs’ or ‘lobes’ were seen to maneuver over angles of five to ten degrees in seconds and then go into formation before assembling into the large craft or else going inside it. 

    The mothership and the drones, just like Kirkpatrick and Loeb said…

     

    Speakers:

    — Richard Griffiths(Speaker) Univ Hawaii Hilo, Physics and Astronomy, Member SCU

    — Alejandro Rojas(Speaker)SCU, Enigma, Board Member

  4. Evidence probably already confiscated by gov’t, witnesses probably already threatened.

    People with evidence need to push it out fucking immediately through multiple channels to get it distributed quickly.

  5. This is getting annoying as shit. If aliens are real and semi colonized here already and flying around their freakin mothership, just show yourselves and introduce yourselves to the public, stop cockteasing us with «he said she said» reddit stories

  6. > upper limit are placed on the gravitational lensing of background field stars in the vicinity of the craft:

    are they saying they measured the gravity lens affect around the craft?!

    I don’t understand this sentence. I understand the words, but not the meaning.

    «We theorize upper limits….»…»We observed upper limits»…its an incomplete sentence.

  7. We’ll see what the pictures and video looks like.

    Stories are great, but I already believe in aliens, I want physical evidence and/or pictures that don’t just show indistinguishable glares of light that could be anything.

  8. Ok, here’s a theory…They put this out with a deadline to give the government a chance to come on board (punny?) and tell us what they know/have known so there’s maybe less confusion or panic? If not SCU says it an ultimatum and they will release the proof anyway and ultimately force the government’s hand.

  9. Reminds me of that ISS video that was over going over Japan and had a huge craft that was camouflaged into the background. It was taken down after an hour or two after it was uploaded. Loeb and Kirkpatrick are certainly right.

  10. If it’s publicly observed filmed and photographed where’s the public vids ands pics if I took them you bet your sweet ass they would be on all my social media because it would be something worth showing folks

  11. And the video of this Mile long object that’s apparently missing again is currently described as being reviewed by the Air Force I presume?

    Or was that considered «Classified» too? Any chance we get that?

  12. I always think of the «invisible» shield technology that has been around for commercial use since a few years back. It’s just dumb not to think that the military has «perfected» this technology and has a more stable and better version than us.
    Just Google invisible cloak/shield on Google and it should pop right up

  13. Wow, this is huge! It’s definitely exciting to see a scientific coalition taking interest in UAP studies. I can’t wait to hear more about the evidence presented at the conference and what conclusions they draw from it. Do you think this sighting will lead to more research and investigation into UAPs?

  14. Someone in the r/remoteviewing group recently posted about visualizing something large, metallic, stationary, and seemingly made/fashioned (non-organic or natural) over the North Arctic. I wonder if it’s related.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *